Onslow & Onslow

The appellant, Mrs Onslow, sought to appeal the orders made by Judge Jarrett on 24 September 2013, which were related to a family law matter. The respondent, Mr Onslow, sought to uphold the orders of the Judge. The appeal was heard in the Family Court of Australia.

The court was required to determine whether the appeal against the orders of Judge Jarrett was well-founded. Specifically, the court had to examine whether the Judge had erred in his findings or in his exercise of discretion when making the orders. The court also needed to consider whether the orders were just and equitable in all the circumstances.

The court found that the appeal was not well-founded and dismissed it. The court held that the Judge had not erred in his findings or in his exercise of discretion. The court was satisfied that the orders were just and equitable in all the circumstances. The court also found that the appellant’s appeal was an abuse of process and ordered that she pay the respondent’s costs of and incidental to the appeal.