Onkyo Kabushiki Kaisha Doing Business as Onkyo Corporation v Dynaudio Holdings A/S

Case

[2018] ATMO 120

1 August 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Onkyo Kabushiki Kaisha Doing Business as Onkyo Corporation v Dynaudio Holdings A/S [2018] ATMO 120 [2018] ATMO 120 1 August 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Onkyo Kabushiki Kaisha, doing business as Onkyo Corporation (the Applicant), sought to register the trade mark "ONKYO" in class 9. Dynaudio Holdings A/S (the Opponent) opposed this application. The decision was made by Nicholas Smith, a Hearing Officer.

The Opponent contended that the trade mark should not be registered under section 43 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth), arguing that its use in relation to the Applicant's goods was likely to deceive or cause confusion. The core legal issue was whether the use of the trade mark "ONKYO" in relation to the specified goods would lead to such deception or confusion.

The Hearing Officer found that the Opponent had failed to establish the ground of opposition under section 43. His reasoning was that he was not satisfied that the use of the trade mark in relation to the Applicant's goods would create an apparent connotation likely to result in deception or confusion. Consequently, the Opponent did not establish any of the grounds of opposition it nominated.

The Hearing Officer ordered that Trade Mark application no. 1766497 may proceed to registration one month from the date of the decision, unless a notice of appeal was served on the Registrar, in which case registration would be stayed until the appeal was withdrawn or discontinued. The Applicant was awarded costs against the Opponent.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Law

  • Intellectual Property

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Costs

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0