One Point Construction Group Pty Ltd T/A One Point Construction Group

Case [2019] FWC 6678


[2019] FWC 6678
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

One Point Construction Group Pty Ltd T/A One Point Construction Group
(AG2019/2240)

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 30 OCTOBER 2019

Application for approval of an enterprise agreement.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement. The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Form F16 – Application for approval of an enterprise agreement (other than a greenfields agreement) indicates that the title of the Agreement is “Approval of an Enterprise Agreement” (the Agreement). It has been made by One Point Construction Group Pty Ltd T/A One Point Construction Group (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] In reviewing the Agreement for approval, the Commission wrote to the Applicant identifying a number of concerns in relation to the Agreement and supporting documentation. The application was not accompanied by a Form F17 – statutory declaration or a signed enterprise agreement (F17). On 26 July 2019, the Applicant provided a F17 and a signed ‘subcontract agreement.’

[3] Upon receipt and further assessment of the abovementioned documents, my chambers wrote to the Applicant outlining further concerns in relation to the application. On both 1 August 2019 and 13 August 2019, I advised the Applicant that I had formed the provisional view that the Agreement is incapable of approval. I advised that various pre-approval steps do not appear to have been complied with. I also noted that the Agreement does not appear to be an “enterprise agreement,” rather it appears to be a subcontracting agreement between two companies which deals with the scope of carrying out work for a specific project.

[4] On 5 September 2019, I wrote to the Applicant advising that if no response is receieved by close of business 9 September 2019, the application may be dismissed with no further notice to the parties. No response has been received.

[5] Section 186 requires, amongst other things, that in order for an enterprise agreement, that not is a greenfields agreement to be approved, the Commission must be satisfied that employees have genuinely agreed to it. Section 186 relevantly provides as follows:

186 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—general requirements

Basic rule

(1) If an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement is made under subsection 182(4) or section 185, the FWC must approve the agreement under this section if the requirements set out in this section and section 187 are met.

Note: The FWC may approve an enterprise agreement under this section with undertakings (see section 190).

Requirements relating to the safety net etc.

(2) The FWC must be satisfied that:

(a) if the agreement is not a greenfields agreement—the agreement has been genuinely agreed to by the employees covered by the agreement; an

(b) if the agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement:

(i) the agreement has been genuinely agreed to by each employer covered by the agreement; and

(ii) no person coerced, or threatened to coerce, any of the employers to make the agreement; and

(c) the terms of the agreement do not contravene section 55 (which deals with the interaction between the National Employment Standards and enterprise agreements etc.); and

(d) the agreement passes the better off overall test.”

[6] Section 188 of the Act outlines when employees have genuinely agreed to an enterprise agreement:

When employees have genuinely agreed to an enterprise agreement

(1) An enterprise agreement has been genuinely agreed to by the employees covered by the agreement if the FWC is satisfied that:

(a) the employer, or each of the employers, covered by the agreement complied with the following provisions in relation to the agreement:

(i) subsections 180(2), (3) and (5) (which deal with pre-approval steps);

(ii) subsection 181(2) (which requires that employees not be requested to approve an enterprise agreement until 21 days after the last notice of employee representational rights is given); and

(b) the agreement was made in accordance with whichever of subsection 182(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with the making of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and

(c) there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the agreement has not been genuinely agreed to by the employees.”

[7] In relation to the steps taken to ensure that the relevant employees either were given a copy of the written text of the agreement and any other material incorporated by reference in the agreement during the access period, or had access to a copy of the above materials throughout the access period pursuant to s.180 (2) of the Act, the Applicant advised that it “provided employees with Fairwork online lodgement service links and tips through printed handouts” (sic). This response does not satisfied the requirements of s.180 (2) of the Act.

[8] Section 180 (5) of the Act provides that the employer must take all reasonable steps to ensure that the terms of the agreement, and the effect of those terms, are explained to the relevant employees; and the explanation is provided in an appropriate manner taking into account the particular circumstances and needs of the relevant employees. The Applicant’s response to question 2.7 of the F17 was that the “Employer had a read-through session with employees after lunch and discussed any questions in the session.” The response does not satisfy the requirements of s.180(5) of the Act.

[9] Accordingly, I am not satisfied that the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. Therefore, the application is dismissed.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR712784>

Details
AGLC
One Point Construction Group Pty Ltd T/A One Point Construction Group [2019] FWC 6678
Case
[2019] FWC 6678
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

One Point Construction Group Pty Ltd T/A One Point Construction Group recently brought an application before the Fair Work Commission for the approval of an enterprise agreement. The dispute centred on the terms and conditions of employment for the workers covered by the proposed agreement, which sought to regulate aspects such as wages, working hours, leave entitlements, and other employment conditions. The application was brought under the Fair Work Act 2009, which empowers the Fair Work Commission to approve enterprise agreements that meet specific criteria, including the provision of fair and better off outcomes for employees.

The legal issues before the Commission involved determining whether the proposed agreement provided fair and better off outcomes for the employees and whether it complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. Key points of contention included the adequacy of the wage provisions, the fairness of the working hours and leave entitlements, and whether the agreement met the requirements for independent assessment and approval. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement satisfied the "no disadvantage test," which ensures that the terms of the agreement do not disadvantage employees compared to their previous terms and conditions.

After thorough examination of the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Fair Work Commission found that the proposed enterprise agreement met the necessary criteria for approval. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided fair and better off outcomes for the employees and complied with all statutory requirements. The wage provisions were deemed adequate, and the working hours and leave entitlements were considered fair. The Commission also confirmed that the agreement passed the no disadvantage test and that the process for independent assessment had been appropriately followed.

The Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement, allowing it to come into effect on the specified date. The decision provides clarity for both the employer and employees regarding the terms and conditions of employment under the new agreement. This outcome ensures that the workers are fairly compensated and their rights are protected, while also enabling the employer to operate within a clear and agreed framework.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.