[2013] FWC 3338 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Omya Australia Pty Limited
(AG2013/1115)
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 27 MAY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Omya Australia Pty Ltd (Geelong Plant) Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2012.
[1] Application was made on 8 May 2013 for approval of the Omya Australia Pty Ltd (Geelong Plant) Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2012. The application was accompanied by a Form F17, Employer’ Declaration in Support of Application for Approval of Enterprise Agreement from Mr Glen Cameron, Manager.
[2] Mr Cameron’s statutory declaration failed to fully answer question 2.6 and his answer to question 2.8 appeared improbable.
[3] Mr Cameron was invited to file a new Form F17 in which he correctly answered question 2.6 and 2.8. The questions and answers from the second F17 of Mr Cameron were as follows:
“2.6 Please specify the steps taken by the employer (including the date of each such step) to notify all relevant employees of the time and place at which the vote was to occur and the voting method to be used (s.180(3)):
Employees verbally told on 8,9/4/2013. Voted by show of hands on 11/4/2013. May 2012.
2.8 Please provide the following dates:
Date on which the last notice of representational rights was given to an employee who will be covered by the Agreement (s.181 (2)): | 21/6/2012 |
Date on which voting for the Agreement commenced (voting commences on the first day that an employee is able to cast a vote- see s.l81): | 11/4/2013 |
Date on which the Agreement was made (that is, the date on which the voting process by which employees approved the agreement concluded- see s.l82): | 11/4/2013 |
[4] Question 2.6 of the Form F17 seeks information from the employer which goes to matters raised by s.180 of the Act. Relevantly, s.180(1), (3) and (4) of the Act are as follows:
“180(1) Before an employer requests under subsection 181(1) that employees approve a proposed enterprise agreement by voting for the agreement, the employer must comply with the requirements set out in this section.
180(3) The employer must take all reasonable steps to notify the relevant employees of the following by the start of the access period for the agreement:
(a) the time and place at which the vote will occur;
(b) the voting method that will be used.
180(4) The access period for a proposed enterprise agreement is the 7-day period ending immediately before the start of the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1).”
[5] From the answer given to question 2.8 in the Form F17 of Mr Cameron I accept that for the purpose of s.181(1) (as referred to in s.180(4)) the voting process started on 11 April 2013.
[6] The access period for the purpose of s.180(4) commenced on 4 April 2013.
[7] The requirement of s.180(3) was that the employer take all reasonable steps by no later than 4 April 2013 to notify the relevant employees of both, the time and place at which the vote will occur and the voting method that will be used.
[8] Mr Cameron’s second statutory declaration identifies that the relevant employees were verbally told on 8 and 9 April 2013 that the vote for the approval of the agreement would take place on 11 April 2013.
[9] On the evidence before the Commission it is clear that the employer did not comply with the requirement of s.180(3) of the Act.
[10] This means that the employer was not entitled to request relevant employees to vote for the agreement on 11 April 2013. The vote of employees which took place on 11 April 2013 was not valid.
[11] The application in this matter has not been validly made and I dismiss the application.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR537274>
- AGLC
- Omya Australia Pty Limited [2013] FWC 3338
- Case
- [2013] FWC 3338
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement contained the mandated minimum terms and conditions of employment and if it was free from any prohibited content. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement had been made in good faith and if the required procedural steps were followed in its creation.
The Commission found that the agreement met all the statutory requirements. It contained the mandated minimum terms and conditions and was free from prohibited content. The Commission also determined that the agreement had been made in good faith and that the necessary procedural steps had been followed. As such, the Commission approved the agreement, finding it to be a lawful and bona fide enterprise agreement.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Omya Australia Pty Ltd (Geelong Plant) Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2012, confirming its compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission's decision provides a clear example of the standards required for the approval of enterprise agreements in Australia.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.