Olssen and Wise

In the matter of *Olssen and Wise*, heard before Judge Neville, the dispute concerned the welfare and arrangements for three children. The existing orders from 2008 were to continue, with specific directions regarding the children's return to their Mother and their schooling. A significant point of contention involved the parents' access to healthcare professionals for the children, with the court imposing restrictions on such actions.

The court was required to determine the specific terms of the ongoing parenting orders, particularly in light of the children's ages and the need for their input. Key issues included the process for obtaining medical and psychological assessments for the children, the role of the Independent Children's Lawyer, and the communication protocols between the parents regarding the children's well-being and education. The court also needed to address the children's understanding of the proceedings and their mother's assurances regarding any views they might express.

Judge Neville reasoned that the existing orders provided a framework for the children's care, but required clarification and specific directives to ensure their best interests were met. The court emphasised the importance of parental agreement or court authorisation for medical and psychological interventions, absent emergencies. The Independent Children's Lawyer was tasked with explaining the orders to the children and conveying their mother's commitment not to take adverse action based on their expressed views. The court also directed the parties to consider the need for expert reports and to advise on the appropriate type of consultant.