Office of the National Rail Safety Regulator (ONRSR)

Case [2021] FWCA 4740


[2021] FWCA 4740
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Office of the National Rail Safety Regulator (ONRSR)
(AG2021/6330)

ONRSR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021-2025

Clerical industry

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 5 AUGUST 2021

Application for approval of the ONRSR Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ONRSR Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Office of the National Rail Safety Regulator (ONRSR) (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 28 July 2021.

[3] On 3 August 2021, I conducted a telephone conference with the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including through the provision of an undertaking.

[4] The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 3 August 2021. The undertaking deals with the following topics:

  Despite clause 5.4.6, an employee will be required to give notice of personal leave as soon as reasonably practicable, which may be at a time after the leave has commenced.

  The notice of termination provision in clause 7.3 will be applied in accordance with s.117 of the Act.

  Casual employees will have a minimum engagement of three hours.

  Part time employees will have a minimum engagement of three hours.

  Employees will have a minimum engagement of four hours when working on public holidays.

  Clause 7.1.5 will not apply, and the model dispute settlement term will apply for disputes concerning termination of employment.

[5] A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The CPSU, Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) emailed my Chambers expressing concern about the application of the model dispute settlement term and requesting confirmation from the Applicant that the undertaking was in respect of disputes concerning termination of employment only. The Applicant confirmed this position in reply email.

[6] The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[7] As the Agreement does not contain a flexibility term which meets the requirements of s.203 of the Act, the model flexibility term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[8] The CPSU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[9] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[10] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 1 June 2025.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE512600  PR732454>

Details
AGLC
Office of the National Rail Safety Regulator (ONRSR) [2021] FWCA 4740
Case
[2021] FWCA 4740
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Office of the National Rail Safety Regulator (ONRSR) sought approval of the ONRSR Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025, which would govern the terms and conditions of employment for its employees. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the legal requirements for approval.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009. The Commission considered whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for a fair and efficient system of industrial relations. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement contained any provisions that would be contrary to public policy or undermine the regulatory functions of the ONRSR.

In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement met the necessary legal requirements for approval. The Commission confirmed that the agreement was made in good faith and provided for a fair and efficient system of industrial relations. The Commission also found that the agreement did not contain any provisions that would be contrary to public policy or undermine the regulatory functions of the ONRSR. Therefore, the Commission approved the agreement.

The Commission's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the agreement and the evidence provided by both parties. The Commission considered the need to balance the rights and interests of employees with the regulatory functions of the ONRSR. The Commission also took into account the need to promote efficient and productive industrial relations in the workplace. The Commission's approval of the agreement ensures that the ONRSR can continue to effectively regulate the rail industry while also providing fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment for its employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.