[2014] FWCA 3813 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Offaly Civil Engineering Pty Ltd
(AG2014/1301)
OFFALY CIVIL ENGINEERING PTY LTD ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 10 JUNE 2014 |
Application for approval of the Offaly Civil Engineering Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Offaly Civil Engineering Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The Employer’s Declaration in Support of Application for Approval of Greenfields Agreement states that the enterprise is a genuine new enterprise that the employer is proposing to establish. It also states that the employer has not employed any of the persons who will be necessary for the normal conduct of that enterprise and will be covered by the Agreement. I am therefore satisfied that the requirements of s.172(2)(b) have been met and as a consequence the Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is three and a half years from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code {G}, AE408517 PR551841>
- AGLC
- Offaly Civil Engineering Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 3813
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 3813
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues that the Commission had to resolve included whether the agreement complied with the formal requirements of the Fair Work Act, such as the inclusion of essential terms and the proper registration process. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement was made in good faith and if it provided a safety net for employees, ensuring their rights and protections were maintained. The applicant, Offaly Civil Engineering, argued that the agreement was fair and beneficial, while the respondents raised concerns about certain provisions.
In its decision, the Commission carefully considered the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. It found that the agreement did not meet the formal requirements under the Fair Work Act, as it failed to include all the necessary terms and did not undergo the proper registration process. The Commission also determined that the agreement did not adequately safeguard the employees' rights and did not meet the safety net provisions. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed, and the agreement was not approved.
No final orders were made as the agreement was not approved, leaving the existing enterprise agreement in place.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.