of SafeWork NSW v Concrite Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2021] NSWDC 191
•21 May 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
of SafeWork NSW v Concrite Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 191
[2021] NSWDC 191
21 May 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
SafeWork NSW brought a prosecution against Concrite Pty Ltd for breaches of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW). The offences arose out of an incident at a construction site in which a worker was killed. The dispute was heard by the Local Court of New South Wales. The court had to decide whether the defendant was guilty of the offences and, if so, what the appropriate sentence should be. The legal issues included the objective seriousness of the offences, the mitigating and aggravating factors, the plea of guilty, and the appropriate fine to be imposed.
The court found that the defendant was guilty of failing to notify SafeWork of a notifiable incident and failing to consult, co--operate and co-ordinate activities with other persons who had a duty under s 19(1) of the Act. The court considered the objective seriousness of the offences, which was high due to the death of the worker. The court also considered mitigating factors, such as the defendant's plea of guilty and its efforts to improve its safety management systems. However, the court found that the defendant's failure to notify SafeWork of the incident was an aggravating factor. The court concluded that the appropriate sentence was a fine of $600,000, reduced by 25% to reflect the plea of guilty, resulting in a fine of $450,000. The court also ordered that 50% of the fine be paid to the prosecutor and that the defendant pay the prosecutor's costs.
The court made several orders, including a conviction against the defendant, a fine of $450,000, and payment of the prosecutor's costs. The court also ordered that 50% of the fine be paid to the prosecutor. The court considered the appropriate sentence to be one that would achieve general and specific deterrence, reflect the objective seriousness of the offences, and be proportionate to the defendant's capacity to pay. The court did not consider it necessary to impose a custodial sentence, given the defendant's plea of guilty and its efforts to improve its safety management systems.
The court found that the defendant was guilty of failing to notify SafeWork of a notifiable incident and failing to consult, co--operate and co-ordinate activities with other persons who had a duty under s 19(1) of the Act. The court considered the objective seriousness of the offences, which was high due to the death of the worker. The court also considered mitigating factors, such as the defendant's plea of guilty and its efforts to improve its safety management systems. However, the court found that the defendant's failure to notify SafeWork of the incident was an aggravating factor. The court concluded that the appropriate sentence was a fine of $600,000, reduced by 25% to reflect the plea of guilty, resulting in a fine of $450,000. The court also ordered that 50% of the fine be paid to the prosecutor and that the defendant pay the prosecutor's costs.
The court made several orders, including a conviction against the defendant, a fine of $450,000, and payment of the prosecutor's costs. The court also ordered that 50% of the fine be paid to the prosecutor. The court considered the appropriate sentence to be one that would achieve general and specific deterrence, reflect the objective seriousness of the offences, and be proportionate to the defendant's capacity to pay. The court did not consider it necessary to impose a custodial sentence, given the defendant's plea of guilty and its efforts to improve its safety management systems.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Plea of Guilty
-
Sentencing
-
Costs
-
Specific Performance
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Agius v Metal Manufactures Pty Ltd & Jack Platt [2024] ACTMC 16
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Agius v Transport Canberra and City Services Directorate
[2024] ACTMC 17
Agius v Metal Manufactures Pty Ltd & Jack Platt
[2024] ACTMC 16
Brooke Grey v Agnew Building Supplies Pty Ltd
[2023] ACTMC 13
Cases Cited
18
Statutory Material Cited
3
Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd v Nash
[2016] NSWCCA 37
Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd v Nash
[2016] NSWCCA 37
Environment Protection Authority v Barnes
[2006] NSWCCA 246