| [2016] FWCA 2563 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Objectpro Information Sytems Pty Ltd T/A Farmpro Labour
(AG2016/2514)
FARMPRO LABOUR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Agricultural industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 22 APRIL 2016 |
Application for approval of the FARMPRO LABOUR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the FARMPRO LABOUR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Objectpro Information Systems Pty Ltd T/A Farmpro Labour. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 22 April 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 29 April 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 April 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE418677 PR579380>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Objectpro Information Sytems Pty Ltd T/A Farmpro Labour [2016] FWCA 2563
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2563
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission centred on whether the enterprise agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly regarding the procedural fairness in its negotiation and whether the terms of the agreement were procedurally and substantively fair. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement met the "better off overall test," ensuring that employees were not worse off financially under the new agreement. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement's terms were consistent with the relevant awards and the provisions of the Fair Work Act.
The Fair Work Commission, in its decision, found that while the negotiation process had some procedural shortcomings, these did not undermine the overall fairness of the agreement. The Commission held that the agreement was procedurally fair, as it allowed for employee participation and consultation. Regarding the substantive fairness, the Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and met the "better off overall test." The terms concerning classification, remuneration, and other conditions were deemed reasonable, and the inclusion of specific terms did not disadvantage the employees. Consequently, the Commission approved the Farmpro Labour Enterprise Agreement 2016, finding it to be a lawful and fair agreement.
The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the Farmpro Labour Enterprise Agreement 2016, with certain clarifications and amendments to address minor procedural issues identified during the hearing. The agreement was approved subject to the modifications, ensuring compliance with the Fair Work Act and protecting the interests of both the employer and the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.