Obelink and Messina
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 641
•24 August 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Obelink and Messina [2018] FamCA 641
[2018] FamCA 641
24 August 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicants, Obelink and Messina, sought final orders from the court. The specific nature of the dispute and the subject matter of the final orders sought are not detailed in the provided text. The decision was made by Johns J.
The primary legal issue before the court was the appropriate procedural step to take regarding the extant applications for final orders. The court was required to determine how best to progress these applications towards a final hearing in a timely manner.
Johns J ordered that all extant applications for final orders be allocated to a judicial docket. This allocation was for the purpose of listing the matters for final hearing as soon as is reasonably practicable. The court noted that the precise form of this order was subject to its entry into the Court’s records.
The primary legal issue before the court was the appropriate procedural step to take regarding the extant applications for final orders. The court was required to determine how best to progress these applications towards a final hearing in a timely manner.
Johns J ordered that all extant applications for final orders be allocated to a judicial docket. This allocation was for the purpose of listing the matters for final hearing as soon as is reasonably practicable. The court noted that the precise form of this order was subject to its entry into the Court’s records.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Obelink and Messina [2018] FamCA 641
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
2