| [2019] FWCA 7814 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Oaky Creek Coal Pty Ltd
(AG2019/4044)
OAKY CREEK COAL SURFACE RECLAIM ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019
Coal industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 15 NOVEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the Oaky Creek Coal Surface Reclaim Enterprise Agreement 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Oaky Creek Coal Surface Reclaim Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Oaky Creek Coal Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] I note that Clauses 22.1, 24(a), 24(b), 29.2, 6.13 are inconsistent with the National Employment Standards as they provide content not otherwise provided by the NES. Given the National Employment Standards precedence clause at clause 4 of the agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail.
[4] I note that clause 17 of the Agreement allows for deductions to be made from employee entitlements upon termination of employment. I note that any such deductions made under clause 17 of the Agreement must be applied consistently with section 324 and section 236 of the Act.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 22 November 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 November 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE506109 PR714317>
- AGLC
- Oaky Creek Coal Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 7814
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 7814
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. This included ensuring the agreement provided for fair and efficient terms and conditions, did not discriminate against any group of employees, and was negotiated in good faith. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement complied with the existing protections for employees, including minimum wages and entitlements.
The Commission found that the agreement was fair and reasonable, met the requirements of the Act, and did not disadvantage any group of employees. The agreement provided for a comprehensive set of terms and conditions that were negotiated in good faith and reflected the specific needs of the employees in their roles. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement did not undermine the existing protections for employees and therefore approved the agreement. The Fair Work Commission's decision confirmed the importance of negotiated agreements in providing fair and efficient outcomes for both employers and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.