O’Shea and Michaels
Case
•
[2011] FamCA 286
•15 February 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
O’Shea and Michaels [2011] FamCA 286
[2011] FamCA 286
15 February 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application before Dessau J in the Family Court of Australia, involving the child B, born in June 2000. The proceedings appear to relate to child welfare and parental contact, with specific orders made concerning the child's placement on an airport watch list, the scheduling of a final hearing, and the exchange of trial materials between the parties. The court also addressed the discharge of previous orders concerning time spent with the child and established new, supervised contact arrangements.
The court was required to determine the terms of interim orders concerning the child's movement and the arrangements for future contact between the child and the mother. This included establishing a supervised contact schedule, specifying the supervisor, and outlining notification requirements for the father. Furthermore, the court addressed the procedural aspects of the upcoming final hearing, including the filing and service of evidence and the allocation of costs for a prior hearing.
In reaching its decision, the court made orders for the child to be placed on the Australian Federal Police Airport Watch list until further order, to prevent potential international travel. It also established a supervised contact regime, where the mother would spend time with the child for two hours each Saturday, supervised by the maternal grandmother, Ms S, commencing at a police station. The court also set a timetable for the filing and service of evidence for a final hearing scheduled for May 2011, and reserved costs for a previous hearing. The court also noted that the particulars of the obligations and consequences of contravening these orders were set out in an attached Fact Sheet, pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B of relevant legislation.
The court was required to determine the terms of interim orders concerning the child's movement and the arrangements for future contact between the child and the mother. This included establishing a supervised contact schedule, specifying the supervisor, and outlining notification requirements for the father. Furthermore, the court addressed the procedural aspects of the upcoming final hearing, including the filing and service of evidence and the allocation of costs for a prior hearing.
In reaching its decision, the court made orders for the child to be placed on the Australian Federal Police Airport Watch list until further order, to prevent potential international travel. It also established a supervised contact regime, where the mother would spend time with the child for two hours each Saturday, supervised by the maternal grandmother, Ms S, commencing at a police station. The court also set a timetable for the filing and service of evidence for a final hearing scheduled for May 2011, and reserved costs for a previous hearing. The court also noted that the particulars of the obligations and consequences of contravening these orders were set out in an attached Fact Sheet, pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B of relevant legislation.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
-
Standing
-
Injunction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
O’Shea and Michaels [2011] FamCA 286
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0