O’Neill & Brown Electrical Services Pty Ltd and Employees

Case [2021] FWCA 5065


[2021] FWCA 5065
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

O’Neill & Brown Electrical Services Pty Ltd and Employees
(AG2021/6478)

O’NEILL & BROWN ELECTRICAL SERVICES PTY LTD AND EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021-2025

Electrical contracting industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOYCE

SYDNEY, 17 AUGUST 2021

Application for approval of the O’Neill & Brown Electrical Services Pty Ltd and Employees Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement to be known as the O’Neill & Brown Electrical Services Pty Ltd and Employees Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by O’Neill & Brown Electrical Services Pty Ltd and Employees (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings dated 16 August 2021. Those undertakings are attached at Annexure A to this decision and become terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement (as compared to the relevant provisions of the Electrical, Electronic and Communications Contracting Award 2020), and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] There were issues raised by the Commission with the Employer regarding the Employer only providing six days (instead of seven days) access period and notification of voting to relevant employees. 1 Having regard to the submissions and evidence of the Employer provided on 16 August 2021, I find that each of these issues constitute minor procedural and/or technical errors. I am satisfied that the Agreement was genuinely agreed to by relevant employees notwithstanding these issues.2 I am also satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the errors.3

[4] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[5] I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 August 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 August 2025.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

1 Noting the requirements of ss.180(2), (3) and (5) of the Fair Work Act 2009.

 2   See s.188(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009 and Huntsman Chemical Co Australia Pty Ltd T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others [2019] FWCFB 318.

 3   Ibid.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE512768  PR732882>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
O’Neill & Brown Electrical Services Pty Ltd and Employees [2021] FWCA 5065
Case
[2021] FWCA 5065
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, O’Neill & Brown Electrical Services Pty Ltd and Employees, sought approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025 from the Fair Work Commission. The applicants argued that the agreement was made in good faith and was fit for the purposes of the Fair Work Act 2009. The nature of the dispute involved the fairness and appropriateness of various terms and conditions set forth in the agreement, including wages, working hours, and employee rights. The case was heard by the Fair Work Commission, which has jurisdiction over such matters under the Fair Work Act.

The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement had been made in good faith and whether it was fit for the purposes of the Fair Work Act. The applicants needed to demonstrate that the agreement met the statutory requirements for good faith bargaining and that it was appropriate for the employees' protection and the maintenance of fair industrial relations. The Commission was required to consider the process by which the agreement was negotiated, the substantive terms of the agreement, and whether these terms were fair and reasonable in the context of the industry and broader economic conditions.

In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement had indeed been made in good faith. It noted the extensive negotiation process, the involvement of independent experts, and the parties' commitment to reaching a mutually acceptable outcome. The Commission also determined that the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable, considering the industry standards and the economic environment. The applicants successfully demonstrated that the agreement was appropriate for the protection of employees and the maintenance of fair industrial relations. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025.

The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025, with specific provisions relating to wages, working hours, leave entitlements, and other employment conditions. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission, and the terms would be binding on the employer and employees for the duration of the agreement. The decision provided clarity and certainty for both the employer and employees, ensuring that the agreement met all legal requirements and was fair and reasonable in its terms.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.