| [2016] FWCA 9273 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd T/A O’Brien Glass
(AG2016/7243)
O’BRIEN VICTORIA GLAZIERS ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 2016 - 2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 30 DECEMBER 2016 |
Application for approval of the O’Brien Victoria Glaziers Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2016 - 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the O’Brien Victoria Glaziers Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2016 - 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd T/As O’Brien Glass. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 January 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 October 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE422847 PR589013>
- AGLC
- O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd T/A O’Brien Glass [2016] FWCA 9273
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 9273
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, specifically whether it satisfied the "better off overall test" and did not include unfair provisions. The court considered whether the agreement provided employees with at least the minimum safety net entitlements as set out in the relevant award and whether it included any terms that were unfair. The unions argued that certain provisions, such as those relating to penalty rates and leave entitlements, did not provide employees with adequate protections and failed the better off overall test.
The Fair Work Commission assessed the agreement against the statutory criteria and found that it did not satisfy the better off overall test. The court determined that the provisions regarding penalty rates and leave entitlements did not provide employees with sufficient protections and were, therefore, unfair. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed. The court's decision was based on the comprehensive analysis of the agreement's provisions and their impact on the employees' entitlements and protections.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that the O’Brien Victoria Glaziers Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2016-2019 be refused approval. The court's decision emphasised the importance of ensuring that any enterprise bargaining agreement provides employees with adequate protections and meets the statutory requirements for approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.