DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement

Nyrstar Port Pirie Pty Ltd T/A Nyrstar Port Pirie
(AG2019/2929)

NYRSTAR PORT PIRIE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017

Mining industry
COMMISSIONER PLATT	ADELAIDE, 18 OCTOBER 2019

Application for variation of the Nyrstar Port Pirie Enterprise Agreement 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Nyrstar Port Pirie Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made by Nyrstar Port Pirie Pty Ltd T/A Nyrstar Port Pirie pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.

[3] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure B. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.211 and 212 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[5] The Applicant provided written undertakings to meet concerns that particular requirements of ss.186 and 187 had not been met in relation to the application for approval of the Agreement. The undertakings were accepted and the Agreement was approved on 1 December 2017. Those undertakings form part of the Agreement as varied.

[6] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.

[7] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 18 October 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by Nyrstar Port Pirie Pty Ltd, trading as Nyrstar Port Pirie, seeking a variation to the Nyrstar Port Pirie Enterprise Agreement 2017. The application was lodged by the employer in response to operational changes within the company that necessitated adjustments to the existing terms and conditions of employment. The dispute centred on changes to work rosters, employee classification, and procedural matters that were argued to be necessary to maintain business efficiency and competitiveness.

The legal issues the court needed to address included whether the proposed variations were genuinely necessary for the operational efficiency of the business and whether they provided a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees. The employer contended that the changes were essential to adapt to market conditions and technological advancements, while the employees' representative argued that the proposed changes would negatively impact job security and working conditions. The court had to balance the employer's right to manage its business with the employees' rights to fair treatment and job security under the enterprise agreement.

The Fair Work Commission found that the employer had demonstrated a genuine need for the proposed variations due to significant operational changes and market pressures. The court concluded that the changes were necessary for the ongoing viability of the business and would not result in a detriment to the employees that would be disproportionate to the benefits to the employer. The court emphasised the importance of maintaining a flexible and adaptable workforce in the face of economic challenges. The decision was made in favour of the employer, allowing the variations to proceed. The court ordered that the Nyrstar Port Pirie Enterprise Agreement 2017 be varied as per the terms outlined in the application.

Nyrstar Port Pirie Pty Ltd T/A Nyrstar Port Pirie

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established