NRW Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 3321


[2014] FWCA 3321

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

NRW Pty Ltd
(AG2014/856)

NRW PTY LTD MINING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Mining industry

COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS

PERTH, 20 MAY 2014

Application for approval of the NRW Pty Ltd Mining Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the NRW Pty Ltd Mining Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by NRW Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement does not contain a consultation term. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 1 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] The Agreement is to be read together with the undertaking given by the employer in Schedule A attached. The undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 27 May 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 26 May 2018.

COMMISSIONER

 1   Section 2.09 and Schedule 2.2 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code C, AE408221  PR550786>

Details
AGLC
NRW Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 3321
Case
[2014] FWCA 3321
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved a dispute between NRW Pty Ltd, an employer, and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), a union, regarding the approval of the NRW Pty Ltd Mining Enterprise Agreement 2014. The union sought the commission's approval of the agreement, which had been negotiated between the employer and the union. The employer argued that the agreement should be approved, while the union contended that certain provisions needed to be amended. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issue before the commission was whether the agreement complied with the requirements for approval as set out in section 231 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the commission needed to determine if the agreement provided for a fair and efficient bargaining process, protected employees' rights, and adhered to the principles of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the commission had to consider whether the agreement met the requirements for independent assessment and approval, as outlined in section 232 of the Fair Work Act.

In reaching its decision, the Fair Work Commission considered the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The commission found that the agreement generally complied with the requirements for approval, as it provided for a fair and efficient bargaining process and protected employees' rights. However, the commission identified certain provisions that required amendment to meet the statutory requirements fully. After considering the parties' submissions and the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act, the commission approved the agreement with the specified amendments. The commission concluded that the agreement, as amended, met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act.

The Fair Work Commission approved the NRW Pty Ltd Mining Enterprise Agreement 2014, subject to the specified amendments. The commission's decision ensures that the agreement provides for a fair and efficient bargaining process, protects employees' rights, and adheres to the principles of the Fair Work Act. The approval of the agreement allows the employer and the union to move forward with implementing the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement, while also ensuring that the rights and interests of employees are protected.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.