| [2014] FWCA 8084 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Northern Stevedoring Services Pty Ltd
(AG2014/9552)
NORTHERN STEVEDORING SERVICES PTY LTD LINESMAN AGREEMENT 2014
Port authorities | ||
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 13 NOVEMBER 2014 | |
Application for approval of the Northern Stevedoring Services Pty Ltd Linesman Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Northern Stevedoring Services Pty Ltd Linesman Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Northern Stevedoring Services Pty Ltd (the Employer). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The application was lodged at Brisbane on 17 October 2014. The application included a Statutory Declaration of David King made on behalf of the Employer and dated 13 October 2014 (the Declaration). The Declaration stated that the Agreement was made on 7 October 2014. Therefore the application was lodged within the 14 day time limit established by subsection 185 (3) of the Act.
[3] Part 2-4 of the Act includes various procedural requirements that must be satisfied before the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) can approve of an enterprise agreement. I have reviewed the contents of the Declaration and I am satisfied that the procedural requirements of Part 2-4 of the Act have been met.
[4] The application for approval was listed for Hearing in Chambers before the Commission on 13 November 2014. I note that the file has included a Statutory Declaration of Adam Jacka made on behalf of the Maritime Union of Australia (the MUA), as an employee organisation in relation to the application.
[5] I note that the Agreement contains a flexibility term at clause 2.7 and a consultation term at clause 3.2.
[6] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[7] The MUA, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by subsection 201 (2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the MUA.
[8] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with subsection 54 (1) of the Act it will operate from 20 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement as specified in clause 2.4.1 of the Agreement, is 1 October 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE411135 PR557728>
- AGLC
- Northern Stevedoring Services Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 8084
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 8084
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement provided for a fair and reasonable standard of employment for the linesmen, and if it complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. The Commission considered factors such as the agreement's compliance with the minimum entitlements, the fairness of the proposed terms and conditions, and whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement provided for a fair and reasonable standard of employment for the linesmen and was genuinely negotiated. The agreement complied with the minimum entitlements prescribed by the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. The Commission also found that the proposed agreement did not undermine the ability of employees to exercise their rights under the Fair Work Act 2009 and that it was in the public interest to approve the agreement. Consequently, the Commission approved the Northern Stevedoring Services Pty Ltd Linesman Agreement 2014.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.