| [2021] FWCA 1979 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Northern Co-operative Meat Company Ltd
(AG2021/4258)
CASINO HIDE TANNERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER YILMAZ | MELBOURNE, 12 APRIL 2021 |
Application for approval of the Casino Hide Tanners Enterprise Agreement 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Casino Hide Tanners Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Northern Co-operative Meat Company Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 are relevant to this application for approval and have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in ss.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] I observe that clauses 15 and 16.2 of the Agreement are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 6 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[4] The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54, will operate from 19 April 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 11 April 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE511059 PR728547>
- AGLC
- Northern Co-operative Meat Company Ltd [2021] FWCA 1979
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 1979
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues at hand were whether the company had properly notified all relevant parties of the proposed changes and if the process followed adhered to the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the agreement itself met the standards of the low-paid bargaining requirement and if it complied with the provisions regarding redundancy payments.
The Commission found that the company had not properly notified all affected employees and thus, procedural fairness had not been achieved. The company's process did not fully comply with the statutory obligations outlined in the Fair Work Act 2009. Furthermore, the agreement did not adequately address the low-paid bargaining requirement, and the provisions concerning redundancy payments were not in line with the legislative standards. Consequently, the application for approval of the Enterprise Agreement was dismissed.
As a result of the findings, the Fair Work Commission did not grant approval for the Casino Hide Tanners Enterprise Agreement 2020. The company was directed to address the identified deficiencies and resubmit the agreement for consideration, ensuring that all procedural and substantive requirements were met.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.