North Sydney Council v O'Hara

Case [2003] NSWLEC 103


>

Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: North Sydney Council v O'Hara [2003] NSWLEC 103
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
North Sydney Council

RESPONDENT
Louise O'Hara
FILE NUMBER(S): 40119 of 1999
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- production of documents - exhibits to be made available
LEGISLATION CITED:
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 22/04/2003
EX TEMPORE
JUDGMENT DATE :

04/22/2003
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:


APPLICANT
Mr D R Parry (Barrister)
SOLICITORS
Mallesons Stephen Jaques

RESPONDENT
In Person
SOLICITORS
N/A


JUDGMENT:

IN THE LAND AND


ENVIRONMENT COURT


OF NEW SOUTH WALES

                          40119 of 1999

                          Talbot J

                          22 April 2003
North Sydney Council
                                  Applicant
      v
Louise O’Hara
                                  Respondent
Judgment

      Introduction

1 HIS HONOUR: The documents are produced. In answer to the call I note that documents in relation to 35-37 Broughton Street, 17 Willoughby Street, 27 Willoughby Street, 23 Willoughby Street, 14 Winslow Street and 43-45 Broughton Street are produced in answer to a call and the documents to be made available for inspection by Ms O’Hara in the Registry with leave to photocopy as required.

2 O'HARA: Excuse me, there’s just one more that they could produce I think and maybe inadvertently haven’t. It’s 27a Willoughby Street.

3 HIS HONOUR: Yes I think they said they couldn’t find it.

4 PARRY: Your Honour we did look, I’m instructed there might be a file in archives, it wasn’t a file that was readily available Thursday afternoon. We can endeavour to have it brought.

5 HIS HONOUR: Well if any further documents are brought in in answer to the call then they will be made available.

6 PARRY: Yes your Honour.

7 HIS HONOUR: I direct that the exhibits in the proceedings be made available to Ms O’Hara in the Registry and for copying as required. I direct that Ms O’Hara file and serve the balance of documents on which she relies by 4:00pm on 30 April 2003. The applicant has liberty to apply in respect of those documents by 4:00pm on 2 May 2003. Thereafter, judgment will be reserved.

8 O'HARA: Excuse me your Honour I haven’t had yet the opportunity of reading these cases that have been given to me. If there are any points can I make some sort of written submission?

9 HIS HONOUR: If it’s a question of law you can yes. Mr Parry has made it clear he doesn’t rely on the whole of the judgment of course, he put it in his submission what he relies upon and the principles, I note, are not significantly in opposition to the matters that are addressed in both of your original written submissions really, they’re statements of well established law as I see them, but certainly feel free to do that by 30 April 2003 if you need to Ms O’Hara.

10 O'HARA: Thank you.

11 HIS HONOUR: I congratulate both parties on achieving at least a penultimate finality in relation to this matter this afternoon.

Details
AGLC
North Sydney Council v O'Hara [2003] NSWLEC 103
Case
[2003] NSWLEC 103
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, the North Sydney Council, the applicant, and Louise O'Hara, the respondent, were engaged in a legal dispute. The Council sought an order to compel O'Hara to produce certain documents related to various properties, and to make those documents available for inspection and copying. The central legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant was entitled to the production of documents and their availability for inspection and copying by the respondent.

The Court, presided over by Talbot J, ruled that the documents in relation to the specified properties were produced in response to the call. The Court also directed that these exhibits be made available to O'Hara in the Registry for inspection and copying as required. Furthermore, the Court ordered O'Hara to file and serve the remaining documents she relied on by a specific date, and granted the applicant the liberty to apply regarding those documents on another specified date. The Court also allowed O'Hara to make written submissions if necessary, particularly if there were any points of law she wished to raise.

In summary, the Court granted the applicant's request for document production and availability, set deadlines for the filing and serving of additional documents, and allowed the respondent to make written submissions if needed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.