Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: North Sydney Council v O'Hara [2000] NSWLEC 248 PARTIES: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
North Sydney Council
O'HaraFILE NUMBER(S): 40119 of 1999 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Orders :- application for adjournment LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 23/11/00 EX TEMPORE
JUDGMENT DATE :11/23/2000 LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
APPLICANT
Mr P Clay (Barrister)SOLICITORS
Mallesons Stephen JaquesRESPONDENT
SOLICITORS
No appearance
n/a
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESMATTER No. 40119 of 1999
CORAM: Cowdroy J
DECISION DATE: 23/11/00
Applicant
Respondent
1. This matter comes before the Court pursuant to a notice of motion dated 27 October 2000 filed by the respondent, Ms O’Hara. Ms O’Hara has not attended the Court today on the ground of ill health. Ms O’Hara has filed an affidavit which attaches copies of medical certificates. They indicate that Miss O’Hara has been unwell because of a viral infection and that she would be unfit for work from 9 October 2000 to a date which is indecipherable, but which appears to be 8 October 2000.
2. Irrespective of such certificate, on 24 October 2000 Dr Mason examined Miss O’Hara and indicated that he would be further examining her in two weeks from that date. The medical evidence does not suggest that Miss O’Hara has in fact received any treatment for illness. In the event that illness was sought to be regarded as a basis for a further adjournment on the next occasion, the Court regards the evidence as unsatisfactory and insufficient to grant a further adjournment.
3. On this occasion however, the Court proposes to grant an adjournment, noting that Miss O’Hara has spoken to the Registry on several occasions and has said that she will be ready to proceed with her matter from 20 December 2000 and thereafter. The Court will therefore fix 20 December 2000 for the hearing of the matter. The Court indicates now that on that day the matter will proceed to a conclusion.
4. The applicant has also raised the question of tapes of earlier hearings, namely 29 and 30 November 1997, and 10 and 24 October 2000. Miss O’Hara has stated that she will need these tapes to prepare for her future hearing.
5. If it is possible, I direct that the Court take whatever steps can be taken to ensure that those tapes are provided to Miss O’Hara forthwith. The Court makes the following directions:-
1. The hearing be adjourned.
2. The hearing be fixed for 20 December 2000.
3. The applicant file and serve any evidence upon which she wishes to rely by 8 December 2000.
4. The respondent, that is, the respondent to the motion, the council, file any evidence upon which it wishes to rely by 15 December 2000.
5. The Registrar give notice of these orders to Miss O’Hara by registered mail as soon as possible.
- AGLC
- North Sydney Council v O'Hara [2000] NSWLEC 248
- Case
- [2000] NSWLEC 248
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the Court was whether to grant the application for an adjournment due to Ms O’Hara’s claimed illness. The Court assessed the medical certificates provided by Ms O’Hara and considered the opinion of Dr Mason, who had examined her and scheduled a follow-up examination. The Court found the evidence unsatisfactory and insufficient for a further adjournment, but granted the adjournment based on Ms O’Hara's communication with the Registry. Additionally, the Court addressed the applicant's request for tapes of earlier hearings, directing that these be provided to Ms O’Hara.
The Court ruled that the hearing would be adjourned and fixed for 20 December 2000, with a directive for both parties to file and serve any evidence by specific dates. The Court also ordered that notice of these orders be given to Ms O’Hara by registered mail. This decision was made to ensure that Ms O’Hara could adequately prepare for the next hearing, while also maintaining the procedural integrity of the court process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.