[2013] FWCA 8339 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
North Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Management Alliance Ltd
(AG2013/10758)
NAILSMA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013 - 2016
Social, community, home care and disability services | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 25 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the NAILSMA Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016.
[1] On 4 October 2013 an application was made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the NAILSMA Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2016 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) by the North Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Management Alliance Ltd (Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] The Commission is satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 1 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE404961 PR543696>
- AGLC
- North Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Management Alliance Ltd [2013] FWCA 8339
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8339
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine if the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including whether it was free from unlawful content, and if it had been fairly negotiated. The court also considered whether the agreement included all necessary terms as per the Fair Work Act and whether it complied with the process for application for approval as outlined in the regulations.
The Fair Work Commission examined the agreement clause by clause, assessing its alignment with the legislative standards. The court found that while most provisions were in line with the Fair Work Act, certain clauses needed amendment to ensure full compliance. Notably, the court highlighted the need for clearer provisions on dispute resolution mechanisms. After reviewing the amendments proposed by NAILSMA, the court approved the agreement, subject to these modifications.
The final orders included the approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 with the specified amendments, ensuring that the agreement met all legal requirements and adequately protected the rights of the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.