Noelle & Fournier
Case
•
[2009] FamCA 328
•21 April 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Noelle & Fournier [2009] FamCA 328
[2009] FamCA 328
21 April 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Noelle & Fournier*, Dawe J of the Supreme Court of Victoria considered a dispute concerning the division of property between the parties. The specific nature of the dispute, beyond it being a property division matter, is not detailed in the provided text.
The primary legal issue before the court was the application of the principles established in *Rice v Rice* and *Asplund v Asplund* to the present case. This involved determining how certain assets or contributions should be treated in the context of property settlement.
Dawe J determined that further consideration of the *Rice* and *Asplund* arguments was necessary. Consequently, the court adjourned this aspect of the proceedings to a later date for further argument before another judge. The court made no final orders regarding the property division itself at this stage.
The primary legal issue before the court was the application of the principles established in *Rice v Rice* and *Asplund v Asplund* to the present case. This involved determining how certain assets or contributions should be treated in the context of property settlement.
Dawe J determined that further consideration of the *Rice* and *Asplund* arguments was necessary. Consequently, the court adjourned this aspect of the proceedings to a later date for further argument before another judge. The court made no final orders regarding the property division itself at this stage.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Noelle & Fournier [2009] FamCA 328
Most Recent Citation
Gadde & Gadde [2015] FamCA 617
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Lambard and Lambard & Ors
[2020] FamCA 789
Ducatti and Tritton and Anor
[2018] FamCA 979
Riemann and Riemann and Ors (No. 4)
[2017] FamCA 933
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
5
Queensland v JL holdings Pty Ltd
[1997] HCA 1
Queensland v JL holdings Pty Ltd
[1997] HCA 1
Anton & Malitsa (No. 2)
[2009] FamCA 242