| [2015] FWCA 137 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
NMP Pty Ltd
(AG2014/10382)
N.M.P. PTY LTD AND THE AUSTRALASIAN MEAT INDUSTRY EMPLOYEES' UNION VICTORIAN MEAT PROCESSING AGREEMENT
Meat Industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 8 JANUARY 2015 |
Application for approval of the N.M.P. Pty Ltd and the Australasian Meat Industry Employees’ Union Victorian Meat Processing Agreement.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the N.M.P. Pty Ltd and the Australasian Meat Industry Employees’ Union Victorian Meat Processing Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and will operate from 15 January 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 3 years from approval.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE412110 PR559794>
- AGLC
- NMP Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 137
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 137
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement contained all the mandatory terms prescribed by the Act, including the minimum entitlements and whether it was free from any prohibited content. Additionally, the commission had to assess if the agreement had been made in good faith and if the process for its negotiation and execution complied with the statutory requirements. Furthermore, the applicant had to demonstrate that the agreement had been appropriately certified by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences.
The commission found that the agreement contained all the mandatory terms and was free from prohibited content. The applicant had demonstrated that the agreement was made in good faith and that the process for its negotiation and execution was compliant with the statutory requirements. The commission was satisfied that the agreement had been appropriately certified. Consequently, the commission approved the agreement, finding it met all the necessary statutory criteria for approval. The applicant's application was therefore successful.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.