Nipperess v Pace's Automotive Refinishing Pty Ltd

Case

[2012] QCATA 253

5 December 2012


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Nipperess v Pace’s Automotive Refinishing Pty Ltd [2012] QCATA 253 [2012] QCATA 253 5 December 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Nipperess sought relief from the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) against Pace's Automotive Refinishing Pty Ltd, arguing that the latter owed him money under a contract for services. Pace's Automotive Refinishing Pty Ltd defended the claim on various grounds. The Tribunal ruled in favour of Nipperess, ordering Pace's Automotive Refinishing Pty Ltd to pay the outstanding sum. Pace's Automotive Refinishing Pty Ltd then sought leave to appeal the Tribunal's decision. The primary question before the court was whether Pace's Automotive Refinishing Pty Ltd should be granted leave to appeal the Tribunal's decision. The court considered the grounds of appeal and the likelihood of success on the appeal. The court determined that the appeal had no reasonable prospect of success and dismissed the application for leave to appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision stood, and Pace's Automotive Refinishing Pty Ltd remained liable for the payment of the outstanding sum to Nipperess.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Administrative Tribunals

  • Jurisdiction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

3

Statutory Material Cited

0

Cachia v Grech [2009] NSWCA 232
Re Hillsea Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1152
Re Hillsea Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1152