Nicole Bock v Jarjoura Holdings Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWC 2161


[2013] FWC 2161

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal

Nicole Bock
v
Jarjoura Holdings Pty Ltd
(U2013/7101)

COMMISSIONER DEEGAN

CANBERRA, 10 APRIL 2013

Application for relief from unfair dismissal - jurisdictional objection - incorrect employer name on application - request to amend application

[1] In this matter the applicant sought to amend the application to correctly name her employer as MyHouse (Aust) Pty Ltd. The employer objected to the application to amend on the basis that the applicant’s payslips and group certificate had correctly identified the employer.

[2] The matter was heard by telephone. The applicant was represented by her mother and the employer was represented by Mr David Jarjoura, the Managing Director of the employer.

[3] At the hearing the following became apparent;

  • the applicant’s mother had mistakenly identified Jarjoura Holdings Pty Ltd as the employer as she had been unable to find an ABN for MyHouse;


  • My House was identified as the trading name of the employer on the application form;


  • the application had been made well within the 21 day time limit allowed by the legislation and had been served on the Managing Director of the correct employer;


  • the employer suffered no detriment or disadvantage as a result of the incorrect name being used.


[4] Having heard the parties I determined that I should exercise my discretion pursuant to s.586 of the Fair Work Act 2009 and allow the amendment to the application. I note that Mr Jarjoura is both the managing director of the employer and a director of the company named in the original application, although I accept that the companies are not otherwise related. I also note that Regulation 3.32 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 requires an employer (after 1 January 2010) to include the employer’s ABN on an employee’s payslip. I note that the payslip provided by the employer does not contain the ABN of MyHouse (Aust) Pty Ltd.

[5] The application will be amended to reflect the correct name of the employer and the matter referred to conciliation.

COMMISSIONER

Appearances: (by telephone)

Ms J. Sexton-Bock, for the applicant

Mr D. Jarjoura, for the respondent.

Hearing details:

2013.

Canberra:

April 10.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR535535>

Details
AGLC
Nicole Bock v Jarjoura Holdings Pty Ltd [2013] FWC 2161
Case
[2013] FWC 2161
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Nicole Bock filed an application for relief from unfair dismissal against Jarjoura Holdings Pty Ltd. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The primary issue for the Commission was whether it had jurisdiction to hear Ms Bock's application for relief from unfair dismissal due to an incorrect employer name on the application and a request to amend the application to include the correct employer name.

The Commission examined whether the error in the employer's name was a minor defect that could be rectified through amendment or if it constituted a fundamental jurisdictional error. Ms Bock argued that the error was a clerical mistake and that the application should be amended to include the correct employer name to enable the Commission to exercise its jurisdiction. Jarjoura Holdings Pty Ltd contended that the error was material and that it had not been properly served with the initial application, thus questioning the Commission's jurisdiction to hear the matter.

The Commission held that the error in the employer's name was a minor defect and did not deprive it of jurisdiction. It found that the application could be amended to include the correct employer name, and the Commission could exercise its jurisdiction over the matter. The application was allowed to be amended, and the Commission proceeded to hear the application on its merits.

The Commission ordered that the application be amended to include the correct employer name and that the matter proceed to a hearing on the merits of the application for relief from unfair dismissal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.