[2013] FWCA 8306 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Nickol Holdings Pty Limited
(AG2013/2889)
NICKOL HOLDINGS PTY. LTD. EARLY YEARS QUALITY FUND AGREEMENT
Children’s services | |
COMMISSIONER DEEGAN | CANBERRA, 23 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Nickol Holdings Pty. Ltd. Early Years Quality Fund Agreement.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Nickol Holdings Pty. Ltd. Early Years Quality Fund Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Nickol Holdings Pty Limited. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I have accepted an undertaking from the employer pursuant to s.190 of the Act which corrects a cross-referencing error in clause 4 of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached to this decision at Annexure A.
[3] Subject to the undertaking, which is taken to be a term of the Agreement under s.201(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2015.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE404938 PR543647>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- Nickol Holdings Pty Limited [2013] FWCA 8306
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8306
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the provisions of the fund agreement in question were consistent with the statutory requirements for the establishment and operation of a complying superannuation fund under section 110A of the Act. The court had to determine if the fund agreement met the criteria for approval, particularly concerning the management of the fund's assets and the benefits provided to members. The court also needed to assess if the fund's governance structure was appropriate and whether it complied with the relevant legislative provisions.
The court found that the fund agreement was generally consistent with the statutory requirements. The applicant had demonstrated that the fund's assets were managed in a way that complied with the Act and that the benefits provided to members were suitable. The court also considered the governance structure of the fund and found it to be adequate for the purposes of the fund. After reviewing the evidence and submissions from both parties, the court determined that the fund agreement met the necessary criteria for approval.
The court granted the applicant's application for approval of the fund agreement, subject to certain conditions. The conditions were intended to ensure ongoing compliance with the Act and to address any potential issues identified during the review process. The court's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the fund's structure, operations, and governance, as well as the statutory requirements for the establishment and operation of a complying superannuation fund. The Commissioner's objections were dismissed, and the fund agreement was approved as per the terms outlined in the court's decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.