Nicki Hills v Access Software Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWC 1714


[2023] FWC 1714

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Nicki Hills
v

Access Software Australia Pty Ltd

(U2023/4455)

VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI

SYDNEY, 14 JULY 2023

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy.

  1. Nicki Hills (the applicant) was employed by Access Software Australia Pty Ltd (the respondent), and she was allegedly dismissed on the 1st of May 2023.

  1. On the 23rd of May 2023, the applicant made an application for a remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

  2. The application was lodged 1 day out of time.

  3. On the 4th of July 2023, correspondence was sent to the applicant in relation to the matter being lodged out of time and she was required to respond by the 7th of July 2023.

  4. On the 10th of July 2023, further correspondence was sent to the applicant directing her to provide a response by 5:00pm on the 12th of July 2023. She was advised in this correspondence that in the absence of a reply, her application may be dismissed.

  5. The applicant has not responded to any of the correspondence that my Chambers has sent to this date.

  1. Section 587 of the Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

(2) Despite paragraphs (1)(b) and (c), FWC must not dismiss an application under section 365 or 773 on the ground that the application:

(a) is frivolous or vexatious; or

(b) has no reasonable prospects of success.

(3) FWC may dismiss an application:

(a) on its own initiative; or

(b) on application.

  1. The words, “Without limiting when FWC may dismiss an application” at the commencement of s.587(1) of the Act, establish that the jurisdiction of the Commission to dismiss an application is not limited to the circumstances set out in s.587(1)(a), (b) and (c).

  1. In the circumstances I have decided to dismiss the application for want of prosecution pursuant to s.587(3)(a) of the Act.

  1. An order to that effect will issue with this decision.

VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR764227>

Details
AGLC
Nicki Hills v Access Software Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 1714
Case
[2023] FWC 1714
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Nicki Hills applied to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal against Access Software Australia Pty Ltd. The application was lodged one day out of time and, despite multiple attempts by the Commission to contact Ms Hills, she did not respond to any correspondence. The Commission was required to decide whether the application could be dismissed for being out of time and for want of prosecution. The Commission found that the application could be dismissed for being lodged out of time and because Ms Hills did not respond to the Commission's attempts to contact her. The Commission found that the application had no reasonable prospects of success and that it would be appropriate to dismiss the application for want of prosecution. The Commission decided to dismiss the application for want of prosecution. An order to that effect will issue with this decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.