Nicholas Hansen v Guys Freight Solutions

Case [2023] FWC 260


[2023] FWC 260

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Nicholas Hansen
v

Guys Freight Solutions

(U2023/90)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 31 JANUARY 2023

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy

  1. On 4 January 2023 Mr Nicholas Hansen made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. Mr Hansen advised in the Form F2 Unfair Dismissal Application (Form F2) that he commenced employment with Guys Freight Solutions on 14 July 2022 and that his dismissal took effect on 1 January 2023.

  1. On 8 January 2023, the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Hansen’s nominated email address advising Mr Hansen that, on the basis of the information provided in the Form F2, he had not served the minimum employment period. The correspondence directed Mr Hansen to file any documents/evidence to support a claim that he had served the required minimum employment period. That correspondence also warned that if he did not contact the Commission within 14 days the application may be dismissed without further notice.

  1. As the required documentation was not received, on 24 January 2023 the Commission attempted to contact Mr Hansen on his nominated telephone number. However, Mr Hansen could not be reached. A voicemail to text message was left requesting Mr Hansen contact the Commission regarding the minimum period of employment.

  1. On 30 January 2023 the Commission made a final attempt to contact Mr Hansen on his nominated telephone number. However, Mr Hansen could not be reached. A voicemail to text message was left requesting Mr Hansen urgently contact the Commission’s helpline as his application may be dismissed.

  1. To date Mr Hansen has not replied to the Commission’s correspondence.

  1. Section 382 of the FW Act provides that a person is protected from unfair dismissal if they have completed a period of employment. I am satisfied Mr Hansen has not completed the required minimum employment period.

  1. Section 383 of the FW Act sets out the minimum employment period as follows:

383 Meaning of minimum employment period

The minimum employment period is:

(a) if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the earlier of the following times:

(i) the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;

(ii) immediately before the dismissal; or

(b) if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. As Mr Hansen has not completed the required minimum employment period under the FW Act the application has no reasonable prospect of success. As such, I order that the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(c) of the FW Act.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR750078>

Details
AGLC
Nicholas Hansen v Guys Freight Solutions [2023] FWC 260
Case
[2023] FWC 260
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Nicholas Hansen filed an application with the Fair Work Commission under section 394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for an unfair dismissal remedy. Hansen claimed he had been dismissed by Guys Freight Solutions on 1 January 2023, having commenced employment with the company on 14 July 2022. The Commission was asked to consider whether the dismissal was unfair. The Commission had to determine whether Hansen was protected from unfair dismissal, given the minimum employment period under section 383 of the Fair Work Act, and whether Hansen's application had a reasonable prospect of success.

In determining the merits of the application, the Commission found that Hansen had not completed the minimum employment period required to be protected from unfair dismissal under the Fair Work Act. The Commission had previously contacted Hansen to request evidence that he had completed the required employment period but had not received a response. As a result, the Commission was satisfied that Hansen had not completed the necessary minimum employment period. The Commission noted that section 383 of the Fair Work Act requires a minimum employment period of six months, unless the employer is a small business employer, in which case the period is one year. The Commission concluded that since Hansen had not completed this period, he did not meet the threshold for protection against unfair dismissal.

Consequently, the Commission found that Hansen's application had no reasonable prospect of success, as he had not satisfied the eligibility criteria for protection from unfair dismissal. Under section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act, the Commission has the authority to dismiss an application if it has no reasonable prospect of success. Given that Hansen's application did not meet the statutory requirements, the Commission dismissed the application. The Commission communicated its decision to Hansen, who had failed to respond to multiple attempts by the Commission to contact him regarding the application.

In summary, the Fair Work Commission dismissed Nicholas Hansen's application for an unfair dismissal remedy on the basis that he had not completed the minimum employment period required to be protected from unfair dismissal under the Fair Work Act. The application was dismissed under section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act, as it had no reasonable prospect of success.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.