| [2015] FWCA 3131 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Newman Quarrying Pty Limited T/A Newman Quarrying Pty Limited
(AG2015/1011)
NEWMAN QUARRYING PTY LIMITED CASUAL EMPLOYEE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Quarrying industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 7 MAY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Newman Quarrying Pty Limited Casual Employee Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Newman Quarrying Pty Limited Casual Employee Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and will operate from 14 May 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 years from approval.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE413815 PR567096>
- AGLC
- Newman Quarrying Pty Limited T/A Newman Quarrying Pty Limited [2015] FWCA 3131
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 3131
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary issue before the FWC was whether the agreement was genuinely agreed upon by the parties. The union contended that the agreement was not genuinely agreed to because the employer had not provided adequate information to the union and had not allowed sufficient time for consultation. The employer argued that the union had not raised any genuine issues and had failed to provide any evidence to support its claims. The FWC found that the employer had provided adequate information to the union and had allowed sufficient time for consultation. The union had not raised any genuine issues, and there was no evidence to suggest that the agreement was not genuinely agreed to by the parties.
The FWC approved the agreement, finding that it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The FWC found that the employer had provided adequate information to the union and had allowed sufficient time for consultation. The union had not raised any genuine issues, and there was no evidence to suggest that the agreement was not genuinely agreed to by the parties. The agreement was therefore approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act. The FWC noted that the agreement provided for a number of benefits for casual employees, including the ability to convert to permanent employment under certain circumstances, and that these benefits were consistent with the objectives of the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.