New South Wales Crime Commission v Grimes

The respondents in this case sought a review of a decision by the New South Wales Crime Commission to appoint a tutor for the first respondent. The first respondent had been appointed as a defendant in a proceeding before the Commission, and the second respondent was appointed as his tutor. The first respondent applied to have the tutor removed, claiming that the tutor was not regularly appointed, and that there was no evidence to support the first respondent's legal incapacity or inability to manage his affairs. The court was required to determine whether the tutor was regularly appointed, and whether there was evidence to support the first respondent's legal incapacity or inability to manage his affairs.

The court considered the evidence before it and found that the tutor was regularly appointed. The court also found that there was evidence to support the first respondent's legal incapacity or inability to manage his affairs. The court held that the first respondent had not discharged the onus of proving that the tutor was not regularly appointed or that there was no evidence to support the first respondent's legal incapacity or inability to manage his affairs. The court dismissed the application to remove the tutor.

The court found that the evidence supported the conclusion that the first respondent was legally incapacitated or unable to manage his affairs, and that the tutor was properly appointed. The court also held that the application to remove the tutor was an attempt to interfere with the administration of justice and was an abuse of process. The court dismissed the application with costs.