Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nerio & Anor v Central Coast Council [2016] NSWLEC 1281 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 30 May, 7 June 2016 Date of orders: 05 July 2016 Decision date: 05 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pearson C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: APPEAL: s121B Order; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Eduardo Nerio (First Applicant)
Eva Soliman (Second Applicant)
Central Coast Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Mr D Hume (Applicants)
Solicitors:
Mr P Jayne, Madison Marcus Law Firm (Applicants)
Mr M Winram, Maddocks Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/152404 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement are:
1. The Section 121B Orders (12 & 14) made under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, issued by the Respondent on 13 January 2016 are upheld.
2. The Applicant is to undertake the following works:
(i) Remove all the tubular aluminium fence and associated debris from the Terrigal Lagoon Reserve; and
(ii) Restore the Terrigal Lagoon Reserve to the condition in which it was before the tubular aluminium fence was erected.
(The Works)
3. The Works are to be completed by 16 August 2016.
4. Each party to bear its own costs.
…………….
Linda Pearson
Commissioner
- AGLC
- Nerio v Central Coast Council [2016] NSWLEC 1281
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1281
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the council had breached its statutory duty to assess the development application in accordance with the relevant local environment plan. The court had to consider the applicable legislative provisions, the terms of the local environment plan, and the council's assessment of the application. The court also needed to determine whether the council's actions were reviewable under the Judicial Review Act 1990 (NSW) and, if so, whether there were grounds for quashing the council's decision.
In delivering the judgment, Justice Leeming held that the council had indeed breached its statutory duty to assess the development application in accordance with the local environment plan. The court found that the council had failed to properly consider certain environmental impacts, including the potential for the development to contribute to coastal erosion and the impact on the surrounding natural environment. The court concluded that the council's failure to properly assess the application amounted to a breach of its statutory duty and that the decision was therefore reviewable under the Judicial Review Act 1990 (NSW). The court granted the plaintiff's application for a declaration that the council's approval of the development application was invalid and ordered the council to reassess the application in accordance with the local environment plan.
The court further ordered that the council provide the plaintiff with a written response to the application within 60 days of the judgment, and that the council take all necessary steps to ensure that its reassessment of the application complied with the local environment plan. The court also ordered the council to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.