Neil v Nott
Case
•
[1993] HCATrans 190
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Neil v Nott [1993] HCATrans 190
[1993] HCATrans 190
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Special leave to appeal was sought in the High Court of Australia from a decision concerning Peter Christison Neil and James Henry Nott and Barbara. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties was not detailed in the provided transcript.
The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether to grant special leave to appeal. This involves the Court determining if the case raises a question of law of sufficient importance to warrant a full appeal.
The Court, comprising Deane J, McHugh J, and Toohey J, considered the application for special leave. Following their deliberation, special leave to appeal was granted. The matter was subsequently adjourned sine die.
The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether to grant special leave to appeal. This involves the Court determining if the case raises a question of law of sufficient importance to warrant a full appeal.
The Court, comprising Deane J, McHugh J, and Toohey J, considered the application for special leave. Following their deliberation, special leave to appeal was granted. The matter was subsequently adjourned sine die.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Neil v Nott [1993] HCATrans 190
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0