Neil Lawrence Ricketts & Amy Ricketts v G C Betta Homes Pty Ltd

Case [1978] FCA 124


M;1, ;\l.

=,;TON

a,g,!carec1 f 5 r

the

a i ~ p l i c a n t s .

HIS RdNOUR:

Yas, M r .

l-Icat3n.

MiZ.

I-T:XL'ON:

I f j w u r H3n31~r

p l e a s e s ,

t h i s i s an

ex

pn r t e

a j b ) l i c s t i 3 n ,

HIS 'rIONNO1T':i

Yes M r .

Heaton.

I no t i ce i n t h e a f f i d a v i t t h ~ t

you^

c l i e n t s a r e

re f'crre3

t o

a s

t he

a p p l i c a n t s and

G.C.

3 e t t a Hmes I ' ty.

Ltd.

i s l e s c r i 3 e 2 3 s t h e

r e ~ ~ ~ o n - l e n t .

IJhat

art^- they

t he

r~ ; sp l ican ts and

res~,DnlJen

t s

t o ?

M . T

O

I f y:,ur

Hon:,ur

,j l e a s e s ,

t h e a1;plican t s a r c naned

3s S U C ~

under

r e ~ u l a t i o n

78

i n the

S ~ n c i l i a t i o n

and

i r 5 i t r a t i o n

re qula t i o n s .

HIS IiONOUii:

What havc

t hey tc , do with

t he General D iv i s ion of t h e

Fc. li:ral Court?

MR.

HE~LTON:

My un Jers t :~nci ing of

the c r ~ s s - r e f e r e n c e between

the

f s j e r a l Cour t

ru1t.s

t3

the

c o n c i l i a t i o n

and

3 r S i t m t i o n ,

and :;tick t:,

ti.1e hidh c x r t r u l z s , i n 3ccordance with

t h 3 t g i s t h a t i t ena'nles

thz

a 2 p l i c a n t s i n t h i s

> a r t i c u l a r

CJSC!

t3 a $ ? l j t,:, the c m r t 2x ,:arte

f o r an i n

junct ion

t o

r e s t r a i n

t h e

c3n luc t which

i s cn,palged i n by t h e

i e fen tan t .

HIS HONOYR:

I alr ;19t ch2llengin:

ygur c l i e n t s t r i g h t t o a2p ly

t:,

thz c o u r t ;

I arr! r a i s i n g t h e ques t ian :

wh;t

i s t h e

v e h i c l e lxn3er which y ~ u

a $ ~ , l y ?

I f i t wsre

an

spp l - icz t i3n

I

cou l J

un l e r s t and your c l i e n t s

i

n

descri.'t,,?cl. a s

the

a , ~ p l i c a n t s .

M2.

T

O

N

Night

I

r e f :r

y3ur 8on:~ur to

r e s u l a t i o n

78(n)

o f

t h t 2 C ~ n c i l i a t i c ~ n

an3 yirbi t r a t i s n

Act.

l l

HIS HOltCUR:

! / h ~ t

does t1lz.t say?

l

l

MIZ, l-JEiiTOi\J:

I t says , "SuSjcct t~ r2_:ulati3n 78(i-)) .

.

.

. .

( r e a d s )

l

..... suppor te-? by

an

3ffi-lt-lvlt v ~ r i f y i n y

t h e

f ? c t s V .

l

HIS H0

:OOTll,i:

Thzt was

back i n the

la,ys when

the

j u r i s 3 i c t i D n

was

corcmittel

ts

t h z

' tLus t rn l i an I n d u s t r i a l

Court

: ) r i g ina l l y ,

I

irr!agine.

Mi3.

XEATQd:

Yes,

t h a t i s c o r r e c t .

It i s m y unders tanding t h a t t h a t

1

g r ~ c e d u r e

i s s t i l l nvni1ai)le i n t h i s c s u r t i n t h e

gen,:ral

j u r i s d i c t i a ~ .

1

HIS 110IVGU;I:

W2 w i l l d c q l w i t h t he subs tcncc 3 f tha rmtt?r.

Nothing

w i l l t u r n 3 n t h e fc~rrr 3f

i t f o r 3 u r 2ri3sent

; ) u ~ ~ ~ s c s ,

!'Ire

1132 t z n

MR. IiEnTGILr:

I ::rr

indebt-. l t o yDur Honour.

Tr 3

svidence i n su ,~ , )o r t

3f

t , . e s r d c r n i s i

and

t h e

i n t z r i r ~

i n j u n c t i g n

i s c ~ n t a i n e d

i n an

a f f i d a v i t

swJrn

t h i s :lay

by Nei l Lawrence

~ Z i c k e t t s

of 14 Hepburn

S t r e e t ,

Br~adm3a

lows.

HIS HOlVCUR:

I f i t w i l . 1 htelg

y ~ u ,

I have

had

t h e 3ppor tun i ty t o

rea 1 t h ~ t

a f f i j a v i t and

t h s 2 x h i b i t s

t o

i t .

l

C

I

an? i n l e b t c l t3 your H3naur.

Thcre

a r e pe rhaps

~ x a t ~ t c r s

which

shouls be

r cen t i~ne j .

i n r e l a t i ~ n

t3 t h ~ t

a f f i l a v i t -

i n t he

f i r s t gclrab;ratjh,

a n l i t u n f o r t u n a t e l y

l

cgnt-inues,

wherein

t h e

a p p l i c a n t

r27e r s

t o h i r r se l f

a s

a

s s y ; l a i n t i f f u

a n d

" th? , ) l a i n t i f f s r t .

Th3t

i s an e r m r

3 f

h y

d r a f t i n g ,

1

HIS

HGMOUiI:

I

w i l - 1

n 3 t be

t r 3 u b l e J by

any

t e r m i n ~ l 3 s i c a l

ine.xac t i t u d z s .

MR.

HZJITO:J:

C e r t a i n l y

thu t

r e f e r ence

s t i ~ u l

l

be

t o " t h e a 2pl ican ts",

< ? n d I

woull

seak t h e c 3 u r t 1 s indulf;enca

so

f a r a s t h a t

i s c3nccrncI .

The

a d g l i c a t i a n

s t e ~ s

fr3m

the

d e f ~ n d a n t

l

c3r12,:any

? i s t r i S u t i r ~ ~ :

tht? d jv :? r t i senen t

rJr

parcshlet

which

i s ~ ? x h i ; ; - i t

5 9 3 r 4 - - -

HIS HONOUR:

This i s the 3ne "Incredilsle Bet tapebble f a r Pebble

F13ors7' .

MR.

I.I%aTO!\S:

Yes.

What

thc

cv i l ence 3f M r .

n i c k e t t s i s , i s t h a t

when h2 ~ r i s

han l i c ~ g

a u t h i s

,~an!,-hlats

t=,

the

, u b l i c ,

t3 whcin-! h2 was handin2 them,

son:^

m e r ~ ~ ~ c r s

3 f

t he

2 u b l i c

r e , , l i e 1 ,

"We

a l r z a d y have

3ne 3f' thhz

,arr!,

h l e t s ,

wc

d o

n a t

r~cc

l

i t".

It

i s r;?.y s u b ~ ! i s s i 3 n

t h L i t t ha

canduct

3 f

thz

l e f e n l s n t i s such t h ~ t

thd di;fenfjant i s a c3rLJ3ra t ion

wi th in

t he

m a n i n , ; 3f

s ec t i on

52, an4

, g s s i b l y

s e c t i g n

53,

3 f

the

Tr:lle

P r a c t i c e s Act;

t h a t i t i s i n t r a - le D r

cmmerct. anf i i t i s an;sging i n cgnrluct wbich i s

n!islcar;?in; 3nd

jece,. t i v e 3r l i k e l y t3 misl2n l 3r deceive .

Y ~ u r

Honour w i l l a - ,

r z c i a t e

M r .

R i c k e t t s

has

m 3 r n

i n h i s

a f i ' idav i - t

t h : ? t he

h ? s

s r z ~ c i n t l n t l y

/ i i s&layed

Q n h i s s tand h i s name

"Incr ;3J ible P ~ b b l e ~ ~ .

The

c ~ n n c c t i o n

i s such t h d t when a cc~nsumer :lr

3 member 3f t h e

,ubl.i-c ,,asses

the

s t and they a s s ~ c i a

t e 3r

c ~ n n e c t

l~etwcen the

$ l a i n t i f f s an2

thc

i e f e n l a n t

thz

narce

" I n c r e l i ' k~ lz" .

HIS IIONGUI1:

It nay i d r h a t J s a s s i s t you

if I were t 3 say t h a t tha

r r j a t t ~ r

t h<:

t

i s c ~ n c e r n i n . : me

i n r e 1 1ti : ;n

t3

your

, ~ r ~ s e n t

3 , Jp l i ca t i c , n i s whether

-it woull

n 3 t be

h a t t e r

4zrha; s

to

r r . ~ n t

you h a v e t o s h o r t sc2rve an ~ r l e r

n i s i ,

h,-lve i t w! 2 1~3

r e t u r n 3 h l e

ton?:)rrow,

an l

d i r n c t

t h a t

s z rv i cd o f

t he o r l t ? r n i s i 3afl t

h

a f f i , ? n v i t i

~

n

su; ; ,ort

b e :lt'f',:cte

l.

f a r t h w i t h .

That woulJ

,r3duce

the

r d s u l t t h u t 1 3 ; t l ;

; ~ a r t i ~ s

~ 3 ~ 1 1

h3ve an portuni unity 3f

bein:

Lefc,re t he c o u r t ,

MIi.

IEI~TOl\T"

-1

, ;rcci3te

t h s t , y9ur H ~ n o u r , yes.

The t ~ a t t e r

daes have ur:incy

bscause

c~f t h s v31 ur~u of people whc,

ga s s

tl?rou,;)l~

this y-irticu'ln r home s h ~ w

i n the confine;j.

d e r i o 3 2f

z i i ;h t

l a g s 3ver

which

i t i s e x h i b i t i n g

a t

t he

E x h i b i t i 3 n

bu i ld ings .

HIS I-IONOUR:

If ysu want t o seek t o ~ ? r s u a f i e

me

t h 3 t I should

make

:ln

o r l e r now

f o r an

i n t z r i m

i n j u n c t i o n I

w i l l 3f

cours2 hear anythin[; you w 3 n t t o , u t tc, Te,

My

. r i r ~ a

f 3 c i z r a . l c t i on ,

hav ins

read

t he

material

f i l e l ,

i s

t o

t h i n k

t h e s h a r t s e r v i c e

s a l i l t i 3 n waulfi

be

t h e

b e t t 2 r

l

I

one ,

b u t

I

w ~ u l ~ 2

be ~ l a l

b h e a r anything y3u want t:,

g u t

tc,

1r.c

i n f3v3ur 3f

t he

int3rirr . i n j u n c t i o n .

MR.

HEaTON

So f a r a s thz i n t ~ r i n

i n j u n c t i g n i s concerned,

I

am

*aware o f

the

dec i s ion

r e t h e Ib rnsby

3 u i l d i n g

I n f ~ r m a t i o n

Cen t r a and

the

Sylney Bui ld in< Infa rmat i3n

Centre ,

and

i n t ~ y

submissic,n i t i s ~ & e n

tc,

t h i s

c : ~ u r t 3 n

t h e

b a s i s

I

sf

t hz jult:?rxents

3f t h e i r H ~ n s u r s

M r .

J u s t i c e

Jacobs ,

Mr.

J u s t i c e Stc,,hcn antl Mr.

J u s t i c e Mur9hy

t h 3 t i t i s

1

q u i t e 1e ; i t ima te

f

~

the

r

a, ; : l icants

i n t he se

circu~-ilstdnces

t c ~

a$ , l y t o

t h i s

c ~ u r t ; if yc~ur Hanour

was

~ l i s , , o s e ~ l

t~ t h c view

t h 3 t the

cc~nduct

en:age4

i n

l

Sy

the

l ~ f e n d a n t

i s o f

the

t y , ~ o r ~ f ~ r r e d

t3 i n s e c t i ~ n

l

52 ~f

tho Trt14e P r z c t i c e s het,

then

such

w 3 u 1 1 be

l

adsrc,r!ricltt.

f o r an

i n t e r i n i n J u n c t i ~ n ,

bea r ing i n mind

1

the uri;enqr of' t h ~

c tL lLr l ica t i3n

so

f a r a s t h e a , , p l i can t s

:;re

c o r ~ c e r n s ~ l ,

and t h a t time i s neccs::3rily

3f the

essencc if the

lece,jtion and n?islsal ini ; , 3r l i k e l y

I

.-l ~ d c e ,

t i o n ,

l i k e l y mis lead in< ,

i s t c ~

be

n i n i r ~ n l

s 3 f a r

a s t h e

,

u:;lic

i s concern33.

I

HIS HONOTJR:

I f you 32% a n i n t e r i ~

i n junc t ian

i t would

3f

c3u r se

be

s u v ~ j e c t

t:,

-- ~ n e r a l

l i b d r t y

tc ,

e i t h e r p a r t y

t 3 zPyly .

MR.

XI~ATON"Y~~

y 3 u r

I p ~ n s ~ r

.

HIS I-ICINGUR:

Y:IU

c o u l l h . : r l l v serve vaur i n t e r i ~

i n j u n c t i o n

before

l a t e t h i s o f t ; r n l j n ,

and i f the

r12s~on326t

were minded

t s

~ , ,~ l j ; .

t~nc,r ,rgw

1r.orni.n;

under

t h e

?;?neral i i b e r t y ,

you w & l l

be

h c k r e a l l y i n t h 2 s i t u a t i ~ n

3f

havin.5. the

saRe r e s u l t 2s i f 1 5ava y3u s h ~ r t

s e r v i c e ,

BwH/W/kc

Ricke t t s

MR.

H ~ A T O N :

Tha t wo1.11-i b$ s a , g ~ u r

I b n o u r ,

y e s .

HIS I-TONGUIi:

I s th::rc

a n y t h i n g f u r t h e r y ~ u

want t3 L J U ~ t3 me,

Mr.

1 3 ~ 2

t s n ?

MR,

!LE,,TON:

N g t a t t h i s st,: :e,

y J u r Honour.

1.

T h ~ r , :

w i l l :ie an ~ r l e r

n i s i i n t<:rrs o f

;~a ra<ra i_ lh

21

o f

t h e a S f i f l a v i t 3 f

N e i l Lawrance

2 i c k e t t s

s w D r n Au+:ust

22 ,

1978,

t.1

be

r e t u r n a ~ ~ l r .

bafcrrs

t h e

Fcr ie ra l

B o u r t

of

l i u s t r a l - i a a t 451

L i t t l e b u r k e S , t r e e t ,

Mel53urne

3 n

Wt?<fineslay, Au;:ust

23 1978, 2.t 10.15 a.rl:.

2,

Le3ve

t3 s h o r t serve t h e 3r3pr n i s i and a C D L ) ~

o f

t'ne

sai.3 a f f i i a v i t an? c ~ , , . y

3f

t h e

e x h i l ~ i t s

t h a r e t o

- -

up)on t h c

r e sL,sn3en

t.

3 ,

D i r s c t

tnL! t

such

s 2 r v i c e

be

e f f e c t s 3 f ~ r t h w i t h .

I

w i l l c m e back t 3 t h e y u e s t i 3 n ~ f

t ime

i n a

m z e n t ,

b .

The

z i > i j l i ~ a t i a n

f o r i n t z r i n i n j u n c t i ~ n

r e f u s e d ,

I t i s sire.?,

I have

j u s t been

i n f ~ m e . 3 ,

t o

have

t h i s n a t t e r

r e t u r n a b l e

be

f 3 r a

h i s H a n ~ u r M r ,

J u s t i c e

S m i t h z r s

t o r ~ 3 r r o w

r3rnir-q

a t 10 a.m.

f o r r e n t i 3 n , so

what I w i l l do i s I w i l l c a n c e l ;,aragraLjh l

and re-;;hrase

i t ,

s o

t h d t i t w i l l r e a l :

1.

Order

n i s i

i n t e r r s 3 f

, : ~ r a ? r a

)h 21 3f t h e

a f f i t5avi . t

o f

1Vei.1

Lawrence

a i c l i e t t s ,

sw3rr1 ~ I u g u s t

22 1978,

t3 b e

r c t u r n a S l z

b e f o r e

t h e F e l e r a l

Cour t o f ~ u s t r a l i a

a t 451

L i t t l e k u r k e d t r e e t , Melbourne

3 n Wclnesday

h u e < u s t 23

1978,

n t I0 s.r?.

I

a - l l ,

n o t 3s

: ) a r t 2 f

t h e

3 r 3 e r b u t f3r

t h e

i n f ~ r m

t i 3 n c~f

t h e , a r t y 9 t h a t i t wo~11:I a:),lcar t h

~

t

h e a r i n d

w i l l be

b e f o r e h i s Honour

Mr.

J u s t i c e S ~ i t h i . r s ,

I s

t h e r e

a n y other

~ r , - ? e r

y3u

s e e k , M r .

Heat3n.

MR. HEIITON: Na, yDur H3nour.

T I Z FU-ITHER H ~ L L ~ I L I G

OF THIS ?LITTER WAS .ADJOURNED UNTIL

TIiE FOLLOWING DAY, LdEDN3dDAY 23 liUGUST 1978, .LT 10.00 l i , M .

i lT 2.23

P .M, T I U COUIiT .tiDZOUTiTJED SINE DIE

8WH/W/sc Il ickz t t s

Details
AGLC
Neil Lawrence Ricketts & Amy Ricketts v G C Betta Homes Pty Ltd [1978] FCA 124
Case
[1978] FCA 124
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Neil Lawrence Ricketts and Amy Ricketts sought an interlocutory injunction against G C Betta Homes Pty Ltd, alleging misleading and deceptive conduct under the Trade Practices Act. The primary issue before the court was whether the plaintiffs were entitled to an interlocutory injunction to restrain the conduct complained of by the defendant. The court considered the urgency and the public interest in preventing misleading conduct, as well as the precedent set in earlier cases.

The court acknowledged the plaintiffs' argument that the defendant's conduct was misleading and deceptive, potentially falling under sections 52 and 53 of the Trade Practices Act. The urgency of the matter was underscored by the significant number of people visiting the exhibition where the defendant was displaying their product. However, the court noted that if the matter proceeded without an interlocutory injunction, the defendant would still be subject to a general liberty to apply for an injunction.

The plaintiffs' counsel referred to previous cases where interlocutory injunctions were granted in similar circumstances, urging the court to follow those precedents. The court deliberated on the balance between the need for an immediate injunction and the rights of the defendant to seek relief later. Ultimately, the court decided to refuse the interlocutory injunction but allowed the plaintiffs to short serve the originating application and affidavits on the defendant. The matter was to be returned before the court for further hearing the next day.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.