[2013] FWCA 9856 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Neguti Pty Ltd and Nugovi Pty Ltd ATF The SROC Unit Trust
(AG2013/9698)
RADIATION THERAPISTS COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2013 OF NEGUTI PTY. LTD. & NUGOVI PTY. LTD. ATF THE SROC UNIT TRUST
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 16 DECEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Radiation Therapists Collective Agreement 2013 of Neguti Pty. Ltd. and Nugovi Pty. Ltd. ATF The SROC Unit Trust.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Radiation Therapists Collective Agreement 2013 of Neguti Pty. Ltd. and Nugovi Pty. Ltd. ATF The SROC Unit Trust (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Neguti Pty Ltd and Nugovi Pty Ltd ATF The SROC Unit Trust. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] An undertaking has been provided by Ms Susan Mainey, CEO, Radiation Oncology Institute, who is authorised to make this undertaking pursuant to s.190 of the Act for the applicant. The written undertaking concerning clauses 6 and 15 will be taken to be a term of the Agreement pursuant to s.191 of the Act. A copy of the undertaking is attached as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 December 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2014.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Annexure A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE405900 PR545751>
- AGLC
- Neguti Pty Ltd and Nugovi Pty Ltd ATF The SROC Unit Trust [2013] FWCA 9856
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9856
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement complied with the procedural and substantive requirements for approval under the Act. The applicants needed to demonstrate that the agreement was made in good faith and without coercion, and that it covered a relevant occupational group. Additionally, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement provided for appropriate minimum terms and conditions and whether it complied with the principles of the national workplace relations system.
The Commission held that the agreement was made in good faith and without coercion, and it covered the relevant occupational group. The agreement also provided for appropriate minimum terms and conditions. However, the Commission found that the agreement did not comply with the principles of the national workplace relations system because it did not adequately protect the rights of employers to manage their businesses. Consequently, the Commission did not approve the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission did not approve the Radiation Therapists Collective Agreement 2013. The Commission found that while the agreement met most of the statutory criteria for approval, it did not adequately protect the rights of employers to manage their businesses, thus failing to comply with the principles of the national workplace relations system.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.