[2014] FWCA 4206 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
NDN Care Services Pty Ltd
(AG2014/6073)
NDN CARE SERVICES PTY LTD (TRADING AS DELLADALE AGED CARE) ANMF AND HSU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 25 JUNE 2014 |
Application for approval of the NDN Care Services Pty Ltd (trading as Delladale Aged Care), ANMF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] On 19 May 2014 NDN Care Services Pty Ltd (Applicant) made an application for approval of the NDN Care Services Pty Ltd (trading as Delladale Aged Care), ANMF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2014 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] The Fair Work Commission (the Commission) is satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and the Health Services Union of Australia, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s 183 of the Act that they want to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s 201(2), the Commission notes that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s 54 of the Act the Agreement will operate from 2 July 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 May 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE408760 PR552391>
- AGLC
- NDN Care Services Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 4206
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 4206
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and contained all the required terms. The applicants demonstrated that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and involved extensive consultation with the employees. The court also found that the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act were met. The applicants provided evidence of a good faith bargaining process and the agreement was certified as having been negotiated in good faith by the Fair Work Commission. The court was satisfied that the agreement was not contrary to the public interest and would provide better outcomes for the employees.
The court approved the enterprise agreement under section 231 of the Fair Work Act. The agreement was found to be fair and reasonable, in the best interests of the employees, and met all the requirements of the Act. The agreement was registered, and the parties were bound by its terms. The court emphasised the importance of good faith bargaining and the role of the Fair Work Commission in ensuring that enterprise agreements are negotiated fairly and in the best interests of employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.