National Union of Workers v Turi Foods Pty Ltd T/A Golden Farms

Case [2016] FWC 6423


[2016] FWC 6423
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

National Union of Workers
v
Turi Foods Pty Ltd T/A Golden Farms
(B2016/955)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

BRISBANE, 7 SEPTEMBER 2016

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Turi Foods Pty Ltd T/A Golden Farms.

[1] This is an application by the National Union of Workers (the Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Turi Foods Pty Ltd T/A Golden Farms (the Respondent).

[2] On 7 September 2016 my associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.

[3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matters on the papers without holding a hearing.

[4] On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Mr A Snowball of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent Company and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent Company, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

[5]
An order has been separately issued in PR585161.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR585162>

Details
AGLC
National Union of Workers v Turi Foods Pty Ltd T/A Golden Farms [2016] FWC 6423
Case
[2016] FWC 6423
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent decision of National Union of Workers v Turi Foods Pty Ltd T/A Golden Farms, the Fair Work Commission addressed a dispute between the National Union of Workers and Turi Foods Pty Ltd, trading as Golden Farms. The crux of the matter was a proposed industrial action ballot of the employees, which Turi Foods sought to prevent, arguing that the ballot was not based on a genuine dispute of interest. The Commission was tasked with determining whether the union's proposed ballot was in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The legal issues before the Commission revolved around the interpretation and application of the relevant sections of the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to ascertain whether the union's proposed ballot met the requirements for a genuine dispute of interest, and if the union had adhered to the procedural obligations under the Act. The Commission needed to consider the evidence presented by both parties regarding the nature of the dispute, the procedural fairness of the ballot process, and whether the union's actions were consistent with the Act.

The Commission carefully examined the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that the union's proposed ballot was indeed based on a genuine dispute of interest, as it related to an unresolved issue concerning the employees' terms and conditions of employment. Furthermore, the Commission concluded that the union had followed the necessary procedural steps and that the proposed ballot was consistent with the requirements of the Act. Consequently, the Commission upheld the union's right to proceed with the ballot. The Commission's decision underscored the importance of adhering to the legislative framework governing industrial action, while also recognising the rights of unions and employees to engage in lawful and justified industrial activities.

The Fair Work Commission's decision in this case reinforces the procedural safeguards in place to ensure that industrial action is both genuine and lawful. By upholding the union's right to proceed with the ballot, the Commission has affirmed the importance of allowing employees and their representatives to engage in industrial activities when there is a genuine dispute of interest. The outcome of this case serves as a reminder to both employers and unions of the need to navigate the legislative landscape carefully and to respect the rights and obligations set out in the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.