| [2017] FWCA 5365 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
National Union of Workers
(AG2017/3825)
CHEM-SUPPLY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Storage services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 17 OCTOBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the Chem-Supply Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Chem-Supply Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the National Union of Workers. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The National Union of Workers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 17 October 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 24 October 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2020.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE425753 PR596863>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- National Union of Workers [2017] FWCA 5365
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 5365
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The court was required to consider whether the agreement was in the public interest, whether it provided for a fair and reasonable balance of outcomes for employees and employers, and whether it complied with any relevant legislative provisions. The court was also required to consider whether the agreement was consistent with the principles of the National Workplace Relations System and whether it provided for appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms.
The court found that the proposed agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval. The court identified several provisions in the agreement that were inconsistent with the principles of the National Workplace Relations System, and which provided for outcomes that were not fair and reasonable for employees. The court also found that the agreement did not provide for appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms, and that it was not in the public interest to approve the agreement. As a result, the court refused to approve the proposed agreement. The court ordered that the application for approval of the agreement be dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.