[2013] FWCA 8040 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
National Union of Workers
(AG2013/9740)
FLORSHEIM PTY LTD & NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 14 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Florsheim Pty Ltd & National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Florsheim Pty Ltd & National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the National Union of Workers (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer however taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The National Union of Workers has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 February 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE404759 PR543230>
- AGLC
- National Union of Workers [2013] FWCA 8040
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8040
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Commission had to resolve were whether the agreement was made in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the 'better off overall test'. This test requires that employees be no worse off financially and, in some cases, better off overall compared to their previous conditions. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement provided for procedural fairness, ensuring that employees had an opportunity to be involved in the negotiation process.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was made in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission also determined that the agreement satisfied the better off overall test, as it provided for improved conditions for the employees, including better wages and leave entitlements. The Commission further held that the agreement was procedurally fair, as it involved appropriate consultation with the employees. Consequently, the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was successful.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Florsheim Pty Ltd and National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2013, effective from 1 March 2013. The Commission ordered that the agreement be registered and that it would govern the terms and conditions of employment for the relevant employees. The decision ensures that the employees benefit from the improved terms and conditions provided for in the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.