| [2017] FWCA 3453 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
National Maritime Services Pty Ltd
(AG2017/2140)
NATIONAL MARITIME SERVICES & MARITIME UNION OF AUSTRALIA BOTANY LINES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Port authorities | |
COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC | MELBOURNE, 28 JUNE 2017 |
Application for approval of the National Maritime Services & Maritime Union of Australia Botany Lines Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the National Maritime Services & Maritime Union of Australia Botany Lines Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by National Maritime Services Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Maritime Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 28 June 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 5 July 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 12 September 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE424761 PR594142>
- AGLC
- National Maritime Services Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 3453
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 3453
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues revolved around whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and other relevant industrial relations legislation. The objections raised included concerns over the agreement's procedural validity, the fairness of its terms, and its alignment with the statutory framework governing enterprise agreements. The court had to scrutinise the agreement in detail, ensuring it adhered to the requirements for proper notice, consultation, and representation as stipulated by the legislation.
After thorough examination, the Fair Work Commission concluded that the agreement substantially complied with the legal standards. The court found that the necessary procedural steps had been followed, and the agreement's terms were fair and reasonable. Consequently, the application for approval was granted, and the agreement was approved as a registered enterprise agreement. The decision affirmed the agreement's validity, allowing it to take effect and govern the employment conditions of the workers involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.