DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters Ltd
(AG2015/7851)

NAATI ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2020

Australian Capital Territory
COMMISSIONER LEE	MELBOURNE, 9 FEBRUARY 2016

Application for approval of the NAATI Enterprise Agreement 2016-2020.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the NAATI Enterprise Agreement 2016-2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 9 February 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 16 February 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 8 February 2020.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved the National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters Ltd, an applicant seeking approval of an Enterprise Agreement for the period 2016-2020. The dispute centred on the fairness and compliance of the proposed agreement with relevant industrial laws. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission, a body with jurisdiction to adjudicate on such matters.

The legal issues the court had to address included whether the agreement satisfied the requirements for 'no disadvantage' as outlined in the Fair Work Act. This meant assessing whether the proposed agreement would unfairly disadvantage employees by not providing adequate minimum entitlements, as well as ensuring that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and that the requisite procedural fairness had been observed in its development.

The Fair Work Commission carefully examined the proposed agreement against these criteria. It considered the views of the employees, the fairness of the terms, and the negotiation process. Ultimately, the Commission found that the agreement met the necessary standards and did not result in any unfair disadvantage to employees. The Commission approved the application, recognising that the agreement provided appropriate minimum entitlements and was the product of a fair negotiation process.

The Fair Work Commission ordered the approval of the NAATI Enterprise Agreement 2016-2020, confirming its compliance with the relevant industrial laws and its fairness to all parties involved. This decision sets a precedent for similar agreements and provides clarity on the standards expected in the negotiation and approval of enterprise agreements.

National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established