| [2016] FWCA 3010 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Narrogin Hay Pty Ltd and Pentarch Grains Pty Ltd
(AG2016/829)
NARROGIN HAY PTY LTD AND PENTARCH GRAINS PTY LTD EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 2016
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 13 MAY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Narrogin Hay Pty Ltd and Pentarch Grains Pty Ltd Employment Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Narrogin Hay Pty Ltd and Pentarch Grains Pty Ltd Employment Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Narrogin Hay Pty Ltd and Pentarch Grains Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement was approved on 13 May 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 20 May 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE418914 PR580317>
- AGLC
- Narrogin Hay Pty Ltd and Pentarch Grains Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 3010
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 3010
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court needed to address were whether the proposed employment agreement met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, and whether it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009. The primary concern was to ensure that the agreement did not undermine the protections afforded to employees and that it adhered to the legislative framework governing employment agreements. Additionally, the court had to determine whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it would result in a fairer and more efficient workplace.
The court found that the proposed employment agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and did not contravene the provisions of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009. The Deputy President concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the specific circumstances of the applicants and the interests of the employees. The court found that the agreement provided adequate protections for employees, and that it would result in a more flexible and efficient workplace. The Deputy President approved the employment agreement, finding that it met the necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009.
The final orders of the court were that the applicants' employment agreement be approved, and that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Commission. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that employment agreements comply with the legislative framework and that they provide adequate protections for employees. The court's decision provides guidance for future applications for the approval of employment agreements, and highlights the need for careful consideration of the specific circumstances of each case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.