| [2016] FWCA 133 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Naracoorte Home for the Aged Inc T/A Longridge Aged Care
(AG2015/7691)
NARACOORTE HOME FOR THE AGED INC LONGRIDGE AGED CARE SECTOR EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Aged care industry | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 7 JANUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Naracoorte Home for the Aged Inc Longridge Aged Care Sector Employees Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] On 16 December 2015 Naracoorte Home for the Aged Inc T/A Longridge Aged Care (Applicant) made an application for approval of the Naracoorte Home for the Aged Inc Longridge Aged Care Sector Employees Enterprise Agreement 2015 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] The Commission is satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, has been met.
[4] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2), the Commission notes that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s 54 of the Act the Agreement will operate from 14 January 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 April 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE417374 PR575925>
- AGLC
- Naracoorte Home for the Aged Inc T/A Longridge Aged Care [2016] FWCA 133
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 133
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court had to address included whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to the procedural fairness in the agreement's negotiation and the substantive fairness of the terms themselves. The court needed to determine if the agreement was made in good faith, if it provided for the proper characterisation of employees, and if it contained minimum terms that were fair and reasonable.
The Fair Work Commission examined the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. It found that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and that the process adhered to the required procedural fairness. The court also concluded that the substantive terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable, taking into account the specific circumstances of the aged care sector and the need to ensure the provision of quality care for the elderly. The commission was satisfied that the agreement met the statutory requirements and approved the enterprise agreement.
In approving the agreement, the court made orders confirming its validity and enforceability. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission and would apply to the relevant employees from the date of registration.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.