Najib Altos v Fairfield Liverpool Legal Pty Ltd

In *Najib Altos v Fairfield Liverpool Legal Pty Ltd*, the applicant, Najib Altos, sought to appeal against an order made by the primary judge. The respondent was Fairfield Liverpool Legal Pty Ltd. The precise nature of the dispute before the primary judge is not detailed in the provided text, but the proceedings before the Court of Appeal concerned the applicant's attempt to appeal that earlier order.

The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the applicant's Notice of Appeal and Summons seeking leave to appeal were competent. This involved considering the procedural requirements for appealing orders, particularly in light of the time limits and rules governing the entry and variation of judgments and orders.

The Court found that both the Notice of Appeal and the Summons seeking leave to appeal were incompetent. This conclusion was based on the application of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, which govern the procedures for appealing court decisions. The Court's reasoning implicitly addressed the timeliness and procedural validity of the applicant's attempts to appeal.

Consequently, the Court of Appeal dismissed the Notice of Appeal as incompetent and also dismissed the Summons seeking leave to appeal. The applicant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the notice of motion and the application for leave to appeal.