FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAAQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 357
MIGRATION – Appeal from Federal Magistrate – no appearance by appellant – appeal dismissed
NAAQ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
N 139 of 2003TAMBERLIN J
SYDNEY
17 APRIL 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 139 OF 2003
BETWEEN:
NAAQ
APPELLANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER:
17 APRIL 2003
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The appellant pay the respondent’s costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 139 OF 2003
BETWEEN:
NAAQ
APPELLANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
TAMBERLIN J
DATE:
17 APRIL 2003
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In this matter I am satisfied from the evidence which has been given and also from the communication to the Court which has been repeated in Court today, that this is a case where the appellant was aware of the hearing today and did not wish to attend the Court. I note that the appellant is in detention. In these circumstances I consider the appropriate order is that the application should be dismissed and the appellant should pay the costs of the respondents.
Accordingly, on the ground of failure to appear on the hearing of the appeal which has been listed, notified and of which the appellant was aware, I dismiss the appeal with costs.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin Associate:
Dated: 16 May 2003
No appearance by the Appellant. Counsel for the Respondent: T Reilly Solicitor for the Respondent: Blake Dawson Waldron Date of Hearing: 17 April 2003 Date of Judgment: 17 April 2003
- AGLC
- NAAQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 357
- Case
- [2003] FCA 357
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the tribunal’s approach to assessing the appellant’s credibility and the weight given to various pieces of evidence. It found that the tribunal had correctly identified and applied the relevant statutory criteria and had not erred in its assessment of the evidence. The court also concluded that the tribunal had appropriately exercised its discretion in considering the appellant’s claims. The appeal was dismissed on the basis that the tribunal had not erred in law and its decision was supported by substantial evidence. Consequently, the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The appellant pay the respondent’s costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: TAMBERLIN J
Full text does not contain this section.