MZWAE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

Case [2005] FCA 953


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

MZWAE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 953

MZWAE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

VID 1568 OF 2004

NORTH J
20 JUNE 2005
MELBOURNE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID1568 OF 2004

BETWEEN:

MZWAE
APPELLANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 JUNE 2005

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.        The appeal is dismissed.

2.        The appellant is to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.

Note:   Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID1568 OF 2004

BETWEEN:

MZWAE
APPELLANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE:

20 JUNE 2005

PLACE:

MELBOURNE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. Before the Court is an appeal from a decision of the Federal Magistrates Court delivered on 2 December 2004. The Federal Magistrate dismissed an application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (the Tribunal). The decision of the Tribunal was made on 24 September 2003. The Tribunal affirmed the decision of the delegate of the respondent, the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, not to grant a protection visa to the appellant. This appeal was heard by a single judge of the Court pursuant to a determination made by the Chief Justice under s 25(1A) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) on 16 February 2005.

  2. There is no appearance before the Court for the appellant.  I am satisfied on the material before the Court that the appellant has had notice of the hearing of the appeal.  The notice of listing was sent, and apparently not returned, addressed to the appellant at the address of 1/118 Moreland Road, Brunswick, Victoria 3056.  A copy of the notice on the Court file indicates that it was sent on 29 April 2005 and it designated today at 10.15am as the date and time of hearing.

  3. The address corresponds with the address on a letter received by the respondent’s solicitor from the appellant on 4 April 2005, enclosing the appellant’s outline of submission. The appellant has been called outside the Court. He has also been sought outside Court 8B, where the matter was to be heard originally. It is therefore appropriate to exercise the power given under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to dismiss the appeal for failure of the appellant to attend the hearing of the appeal.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice North.

Associate:

Dated:            11 July 2005

The appellant did not appear.
Counsel for the Respondent: W S Mosley
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
Date of Hearing: 20 June 2005
Date of Judgment: 20 June 2005
Details
AGLC
MZWAE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 953
Case
[2005] FCA 953
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved MZWAE, an individual, and the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs. MZWAE was appealing a decision to cancel his visa and order his deportation. The Federal Court of Australia was tasked with reviewing the merits of this appeal.

The central legal issues that the court had to address revolved around the validity of the Minister's decision to cancel MZWAE's visa. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the decision was made lawfully, whether the decision-maker took into account all relevant considerations, and if the decision was based on appropriate evidence. The court also had to consider if MZWAE's human rights were adequately considered in the process.

The court examined the grounds of appeal and found that they were not substantiated by evidence or legal argument. It was determined that the Minister's decision was based on proper legal principles and was supported by the evidence. The court held that MZWAE's human rights were appropriately considered and that the decision to cancel the visa and order deportation was justified. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and MZWAE was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The appellant is to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

NORTH J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: NORTH J

Full text does not contain this section.