| [2022] FWCA 3998 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Murrindindi Shire Council
(AG2022/4597)
Murrindindi Shire Council – Enterprise Agreement No. 9, 2022
| Local government administration | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 15 NOVEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Murrindindi Shire Council – Enterprise Agreement No. 9, 2022
Murrindindi Shire Council has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Murrindindi Shire Council – Enterprise Agreement No. 9, 2022 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval has been met.
The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF), the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) and the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (APESMA), being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s 183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s 201(2) and based on their declarations, I note that the Agreement covers the ANMF, the ASU and the APESMA.
The Agreement was approved on 15 November 2022 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 22 November 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 January 2026.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE518177 PR747942>
- AGLC
- Murrindindi Shire Council [2022] FWCA 3998
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3998
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the procedural and substantive requirements outlined in the Fair Work Act. Procedurally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether there was sufficient consultation between the parties. Substantively, the Commission examined whether the agreement provided for minimum entitlements, ensured procedural fairness, and did not undermine the operation of any industrial instrument. The Commission also had to assess whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement had been genuinely negotiated and that there was adequate consultation between the parties. The Commission determined that the agreement provided for minimum entitlements and ensured procedural fairness. It held that the agreement did not undermine any existing industrial instrument and was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission noted the parties' commitment to resolving disputes through the agreed-upon processes and found that the provisions for leave, overtime, and other conditions were fair and reasonable. Consequently, the Commission approved the proposed agreement.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Murrindindi Shire Council – Enterprise Agreement No. 9, 2022, effective from the date of the decision. The Commission’s approval was based on its finding that the agreement met the procedural and substantive requirements under the Fair Work Act, including genuine negotiation, adequate consultation, and fair terms for employees. The agreement now governs the employment terms of the employees, providing a clear framework for their rights and obligations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.