Murrie v Ku-ring-gai Council

Case [2009] NSWLEC 1041



Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Murrie v Ku-ring-gai Council [2009] NSWLEC 1041
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Danielle Murrie

RESPONDENT
Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S): 10486 of 2008, 11105 of 2008 and 11072 of 2008
CORAM: Bly C
KEY ISSUES: APPEAL :- Demolition order and an application for a building certificate
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 03/02/2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 3 February 2009
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANT
Mr G. Green, solicitor
of Pikes Lawyers

RESPONDENT
Mrs L. Finn, solicitor
of HWL Ebsworth


JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      Bly C

      3 February 2009

      10486 of 2008 Danielle Murrie v Ku-ring-gai Council
      11105 of 2008
      11072 of 2008

          This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.

      JUDGMENT

1 These three appeals relate to the residential property at 3 Lightcliff Avenue, Lindfield, and involve an appeal against a demolition order and appeals in relation to applications for a building certificate and development consent.

2 These matters involve a retaining wall positioned in part on the northern boundary of the subject land. It is now proposed that the retaining wall be partially demolished and reconstructed with a different configuration together with landscaping and fencing that has resulted in there being no issues between the parties. There was one objection in relation to the retaining wall by the neighbour at No. 5 and I now understand that with the modifications that have been made to the proposal there is no longer any objection.

3 The parties have now provided consent orders in all three matters. Having inspected the site and considered the proposal as depicted in the drawings together with the agreed conditions and there being no matters in dispute between the parties, I make the orders that are before the Court as Exhibits 1, 2 and 3.


4 In relation to matter 10486 of 2008 the Orders of the Court are, by consent:

      1. The appeal is upheld in part.
      2. The terms of order EPA0014/08 issued by Ku-ring-gai Council on 22 April 2008 are modified by the Court in accordance with section 121ZK(4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the following respects:
          i. The retaining wall is to be demolished in accordance with the plans no. NEW.01/A Sheets 1 and 2 prepared by Narelle Sonter and LDA.02 Revision D prepared by Conus Landscape Design and marked in orange and described as “Demolition Plan”.

          ii. All rectification works are to be carried out in accordance with the engineering plans prepared by Don Macleod as follows:

              a 08063 - S1B
              b 08063 -S2B
              c 08063 -3B
          iii. All works referred to above are to be completed and a certificate of structural adequacy is to be provided to Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council within 6 months of the date of the grant of this consent.
      3. Liberty to apply

      4. Exhibit 2 is retained.

    5 In relation to matter 11072 of 2008 the Orders of the Court are, by consent:

      1. The appeal is upheld in part.

      2. A building Certificate is granted in respect of the works marked in orange on plan Nos:

          1. North East Landscape Elevation
          Drawing No. NEE.01/A Sheet 1 of 2 02.02.09.

          2. North West Landscape Elevation
          Drawing No. NEW.01/A Sheet 2 of 2 02.02.09. (prepared by N S Botanica)

          3. Site Plan
          Drawing No. LD.01 Rev D 31.01.09 (prepared by Conus Landscape Design)
      3. Exhibit 1 is retained.

6 In relation to matter 11105 of 2008 the Orders of the Court are, by consent:

      1. The appeal is upheld.
      2. Consent is granted for demolition, reconstruction, building works and landscaping works at 3 Lightcliff Avenue, Lindfield, in accordance with the plans as set out below and subject to conditions as set out in Annexure A hereto.
          Plans prepared by conus landscape design:

          i. Site Plan No. LDA.01 revision D dated 31 January 2009/
          ii. Landscape Plan No. LDA.02 revision D dated 21 January 2009.

          iii. Sections No. LDA.03 revision D dated 31 January 2009/

          iv. Tree survey No. LDA.04 revision D dated 31 January 2009.

          Plans prepared by Narelle Sonter Botanica:

          v. North East landscape elevation No. NEE.01/A sheet 1 of 2 dated 2 February 2009.
          vi. North West Landscape elevation No. NEW.01/A sheet 2 of 2 dated 2 February 2009.

      Plans prepared by Don Macleod Consultants Pty Ltd all dated 29.01.09
          1) Drawing No. 08063.S1B

          2) Drawing No. 08063.52B

          3) Drawing No. 08063.53B

      3. Exhibit 3 is retained.

___________________

      T A Bly
      Commissioner of the Court
      ljr
Details
AGLC
Murrie v Ku-ring-gai Council [2009] NSWLEC 1041
Case
[2009] NSWLEC 1041
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Danielle Murrie, the applicant, appealed a demolition order issued by Ku-ring-gai Council in relation to a residential property at 3 Lightcliff Avenue, Lindfield. The appeal concerned the demolition and reconstruction of a retaining wall on the property's boundary. Murrie also appealed the council's refusal to grant a building certificate for the proposed works. The Land and Environment Court of New South Wales heard the appeals. The central legal issue was whether the council's decision to issue a demolition order and to refuse a building certificate was lawful under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

The court reviewed the council's decision in light of the modified proposal, which had been amended to address objections from a neighbouring property. The court considered the drawings and plans submitted by the parties, as well as the agreed conditions. The court noted that there were no matters in dispute between the parties following the modifications. The court upheld the appeals in part and modified the demolition order, granted a building certificate for the works, and approved the consent for the demolition, reconstruction, and landscaping works, subject to certain conditions.

The court's orders included modifying the terms of the demolition order to allow for the demolition and reconstruction of the retaining wall according to specified plans and engineering works, with a deadline for the completion of these works and the submission of a certificate of structural adequacy to the council. The court also granted a building certificate for the proposed works, subject to the conditions set out in the plans. Furthermore, the court granted consent for the demolition, reconstruction, and landscaping works, subject to the conditions specified in the annexure to the judgment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.