Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Murrie v Ku-ring-gai Council [2009] NSWLEC 1041 PARTIES: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
Danielle Murrie
Ku-ring-gai CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 10486 of 2008, 11105 of 2008 and 11072 of 2008 CORAM: Bly C KEY ISSUES: APPEAL :- Demolition order and an application for a building certificate LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 DATES OF HEARING: 03/02/2009 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 3 February 2009 LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT
Mr G. Green, solicitor
of Pikes LawyersRESPONDENT
Mrs L. Finn, solicitor
of HWL Ebsworth
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESBly C
3 February 2009
10486 of 2008 Danielle Murrie v Ku-ring-gai Council
11105 of 2008
11072 of 2008
This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
JUDGMENT
1 These three appeals relate to the residential property at 3 Lightcliff Avenue, Lindfield, and involve an appeal against a demolition order and appeals in relation to applications for a building certificate and development consent.
2 These matters involve a retaining wall positioned in part on the northern boundary of the subject land. It is now proposed that the retaining wall be partially demolished and reconstructed with a different configuration together with landscaping and fencing that has resulted in there being no issues between the parties. There was one objection in relation to the retaining wall by the neighbour at No. 5 and I now understand that with the modifications that have been made to the proposal there is no longer any objection.
3 The parties have now provided consent orders in all three matters. Having inspected the site and considered the proposal as depicted in the drawings together with the agreed conditions and there being no matters in dispute between the parties, I make the orders that are before the Court as Exhibits 1, 2 and 3.
4 In relation to matter 10486 of 2008 the Orders of the Court are, by consent:
- 1. The appeal is upheld in part.
2. The terms of order EPA0014/08 issued by Ku-ring-gai Council on 22 April 2008 are modified by the Court in accordance with section 121ZK(4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the following respects:
- i. The retaining wall is to be demolished in accordance with the plans no. NEW.01/A Sheets 1 and 2 prepared by Narelle Sonter and LDA.02 Revision D prepared by Conus Landscape Design and marked in orange and described as “Demolition Plan”.
ii. All rectification works are to be carried out in accordance with the engineering plans prepared by Don Macleod as follows:
- a 08063 - S1B
b 08063 -S2B
c 08063 -3B
- iii. All works referred to above are to be completed and a certificate of structural adequacy is to be provided to Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council within 6 months of the date of the grant of this consent.
- 3. Liberty to apply
4. Exhibit 2 is retained.
2. A building Certificate is granted in respect of the works marked in orange on plan Nos:1. The appeal is upheld in part.
1. North East Landscape Elevation
Drawing No. NEE.01/A Sheet 1 of 2 02.02.09.
3. Site Plan2. North West Landscape Elevation
Drawing No. NEW.01/A Sheet 2 of 2 02.02.09. (prepared by N S Botanica)
Drawing No. LD.01 Rev D 31.01.09 (prepared by Conus Landscape Design)
6 In relation to matter 11105 of 2008 the Orders of the Court are, by consent:
- 1. The appeal is upheld.
2. Consent is granted for demolition, reconstruction, building works and landscaping works at 3 Lightcliff Avenue, Lindfield, in accordance with the plans as set out below and subject to conditions as set out in Annexure A hereto.
- Plans prepared by conus landscape design:
i. Site Plan No. LDA.01 revision D dated 31 January 2009/
ii. Landscape Plan No. LDA.02 revision D dated 21 January 2009.
iii. Sections No. LDA.03 revision D dated 31 January 2009/
iv. Tree survey No. LDA.04 revision D dated 31 January 2009.
- Plans prepared by Narelle Sonter Botanica:
v. North East landscape elevation No. NEE.01/A sheet 1 of 2 dated 2 February 2009.
vi. North West Landscape elevation No. NEW.01/A sheet 2 of 2 dated 2 February 2009.
- 1) Drawing No. 08063.S1B
2) Drawing No. 08063.52B
3) Drawing No. 08063.53B
3. Exhibit 3 is retained.
___________________
- T A Bly
Commissioner of the Court
ljr
- AGLC
- Murrie v Ku-ring-gai Council [2009] NSWLEC 1041
- Case
- [2009] NSWLEC 1041
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court reviewed the council's decision in light of the modified proposal, which had been amended to address objections from a neighbouring property. The court considered the drawings and plans submitted by the parties, as well as the agreed conditions. The court noted that there were no matters in dispute between the parties following the modifications. The court upheld the appeals in part and modified the demolition order, granted a building certificate for the works, and approved the consent for the demolition, reconstruction, and landscaping works, subject to certain conditions.
The court's orders included modifying the terms of the demolition order to allow for the demolition and reconstruction of the retaining wall according to specified plans and engineering works, with a deadline for the completion of these works and the submission of a certificate of structural adequacy to the council. The court also granted a building certificate for the proposed works, subject to the conditions set out in the plans. Furthermore, the court granted consent for the demolition, reconstruction, and landscaping works, subject to the conditions specified in the annexure to the judgment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.