Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Murrell v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 1099 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 8 February 2018, 19 February 2018, 27 February 2018 Date of orders: 28 February 2018 Decision date: 28 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Bish C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: George Murrell (1st Applicant)
Deidre Murrell (2nd Applicant)
Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitor:
Mr Peter McEwan SC (Applicant)
Ms Susan Hill, Hones Lawyers Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Ms Jane Hewitt, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/374176 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely upon the plans referred to in Condition A.6 of Annexure "A" to this agreement.
The Appeal is upheld.
Modification Application DA14/2013/3 for external modifications, a landscaping modification and the deletion/modification of conditions of consent relating to development at 40 Fitzwilliam Road, Vaucluse is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
……………………….
Sarah Bish
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (346 KB, pdf)
Annexure B (5.39 MB, pdf)
Annexure C (679 KB, pdf)
Annexure D (2.14 MB, pdf)
Amendments
02 March 2018 - Order and decision dates corrected
08 March 2018 - Order and decision dates corrected
08 March 2018 - Parties corrected
08 March 2018 - Representation corrected
- AGLC
- Murrell v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 1099
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1099
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence and submissions from both parties, focusing on the council's reasoning for denying the application and the applicability of the relevant planning policies. It found that the council had indeed considered the relevant planning documents and the potential environmental impact of the proposed development. The court held that the council's decision was based on a proper interpretation of the planning scheme and that it was open to the council to refuse the application on the grounds of environmental concerns. The court concluded that the council's decision was lawful and that the plaintiff's challenge to it was not well-founded.
The Land and Environment Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for a declaration and made an order that the council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful and reasonable. The court further ordered that the plaintiff pay the council's costs of the proceeding. The decision underscores the importance of adherence to planning policies and the need for local councils to justify their decisions with appropriate evidence and reasoning.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.