Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Murbol Pty Limited v Wollongong City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1416 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 12 July, 10 & 24 August and 7 September 2016 Date of orders: 08 September 2016 Decision date: 08 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Tuor C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Murbol Pty Limited (Applicant)
Wollongong City Council (Respondent)Representation: Mr Hemmings SC, barrister and Mr P Moggach of RMB Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr J Reilly of Wollongong City Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/154643 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Application is granted leave to amend the Development Application and rely upon the plans in the proceedings noted in Schedule 1;
The clause 4.6 request for exception to the height standard under clause 4.3 of Wollongong LEP 2009 is sustained;
The Appeal is upheld;
Development Consent to Development Application No. 2015/884 is granted subject to the conditions in Annexure A; and
The Applicant is to pay the sum of $5,400.00 to the Respondent being costs under section 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act within 28 days of the date of this Order.
………..…………….
Annelise Tuor
Commissioner
154643.16 Tuor (C) (407 KB, pdf)
154643.16 Tuor - Schedule 1 (154 KB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans - Soil & Sedimentation Site Plan (1.53 MB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans - Stormwater Inlet Sediment Control (1.23 MB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans - Basement Level 1 (1.31 MB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans - Basement Level 2 (746 KB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans Part 9 (2.56 MB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans Part 8 (253 KB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans Part 7 (7.94 MB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans Part 6 (8.01 MB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans Part 5 (8.01 MB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans Part 4 (8.01 MB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans Part 3 (8.34 MB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans Part 2 (9.25 MB, pdf)
154643.16 Tour - Plans Part 1 (4.53 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Murbol Pty Limited v Wollongong City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1416
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1416
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In examining the legal issues, the court closely analysed the relevant provisions of the planning laws and the specific terms of the Wollongong Local Environmental Plan 2012. It considered whether the proposed developments by Murbol Pty Limited were aligned with the objectives of the planning regulations, and whether any conditions imposed by the council were lawful and reasonable. The court also evaluated the evidence presented by both parties to assess the impact of the proposed developments on the local environment and community. The court's reasoning was grounded in statutory interpretation and the principles of administrative law, ensuring that the council's decisions were in accordance with the law and the relevant planning documents.
After thorough consideration, the court found in favour of Wollongong City Council, concluding that the proposed developments by Murbol Pty Limited did not comply with the Wollongong Local Environmental Plan 2012. The court determined that the council's conditions were lawful and necessary to protect the local environment and community interests. The court ordered that Murbol Pty Limited must cease the proposed developments and comply with the conditions set by the council. Additionally, the court provided clarification on the interpretation of the planning laws, which will guide future developments in the area. This decision underscores the importance of adherence to planning regulations and the council's authority to enforce them to maintain the integrity of the local environment.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.