Munro and Elmi (No 2)

Case

[2012] FamCA 270

30 April 2012


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Munro and Elmi (No 2) [2012] FamCA 270 [2012] FamCA 270 30 April 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Munro and Elmi (No 2)*, the Family Court of Australia considered a dispute between a mother and father concerning costs.

The primary legal issue before the Court was the apportionment of costs between the parties.

Cronin J ordered that the father pay one half of the mother’s costs, with the quantum to be determined by agreement between the parties or, failing agreement, as assessed in accordance with the *Family Law Rules 2004*.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

1

Charles & Charles [2007] FamCA 276